Family Practice Vol. 10, No. 4, 431-438
© Oxford University Press 1993
research-article |
An International Perspective on the Cholesterol Debate


* University of Toronto
** University of Oxford
University of Amsterdam
University of Auckland
¶ University of Hong Kong
|| University of Rochester
Correspondence and reprints to Dr Walter W Rosser, Department of Family and Community Medicine. University of Toronto, 620 University Avenue 8th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C1
For the past 5 years there has been an intensive debate and a number of conflicting guidelines suggesting what general practitioners (GPs) should do to screen and manage hyperlipidaemia. At a WONCA seminar in Vancouver in 1992, policies and guidelines from Canada, the UK, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Hong Kong and the USA were reviewed. It was concluded that cholesterol policy and guidelines tend to be influenced more by political and economic factors than by evidence of health benefit. International guidelines for cholesterol screening and management would be of minimal value, as GPs would have to interpret the epidemiological evidence of benefit from lipid screening and lipid lowering strategy in the context of each patient to arrive at optimum management.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. J van den Berg, C. L van Dalsen, R. A. de Rooij, A. Prins, and A. W Hoes Cardiovascular health check in the elderly in one general practice: does it offer new information and lead to interventions? Fam. Pract., August 1, 1999; 16(4): 389 - 394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
