Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FLEUREN, M.
Right arrow Articles by WIJKEL, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FLEUREN, M.
Right arrow Articles by WIJKEL, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 11, No. 3, 275-281
© Oxford University Press 1994

research-article

Care for the Imminent Miscarriage by Midwives and GPs

MARGOT FLEUREN, RICHARD GROL, MARTEN DE HAAN and DIRK WIJKEL

Correspondence address: Mrs M.A.H. fleuren, Free University Hospital, Research Centre Primary/Secondary Health Care, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands

A postal questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 495 Dutch general practitioners (GPs) and 278 mid wives to evaluate the use of the ‘imminent miscarriage’ standard used by the Dutch College of General Practitioners. The response rates were 63 and 87% respectively. The first questions asked related to the respondents' routine management of an imminent miscarriage. The second part of the questionnaire addressed the respondents' attitude to the 17 most important guidelines in the standard. Finally, the respondents were invited to describe problems arising in adhering to the standard. Midwives and GPs differed in their management of an imminent miscarriage. Midwives used more ‘technology’ such as ultrasound scans or a doptone to trace complications or see if the fetus was still viable, whereas the GPs more often carried out vaginal and speculum examinations. Midwives also paid more attention to care following a miscarriage. The guidelines that many respondents did not adhere to involved the period of 10 days for the follow-up appointment and counselling after 6 weeks. Guidelines restricting ultrasound scans and the decision only to refer the patients to an obstetrician after three consecutive miscarriages were also not accepted by all respondents. Respondents mentioned several practical problems or obstacles in adhering to the standard, including women's requests for ultrasound scans or referrals and also the attitude of obstetricians who sometimes simply assumed control. The results will serve as a starting point for up dating the standard.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Emerg. Med. J.Home page
R Hoey and K Allan
Does speculum examination have a role in assessing bleeding in early pregnancy?
Emerg. Med. J., July 1, 2004; 21(4): 461 - 463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.