Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WICKE, D.
Right arrow Articles by JONES, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WICKE, D.
Right arrow Articles by JONES, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 11, No. 3, 292-295
© Oxford University Press 1994

research-article

The Effectiveness of Waiting Room Notice-Boards as a Vehicle for Health Education

DM WICKE, RE LORGE, RJ COPPIN and KP JONES*

The Surgery Station Road, Overton, Besingstoke RG25 3DZ
*Primary Medical Care Group. University of Southampton. Aldermoor Health Centre Aldermoor Close. Southampton SO1 6ST. UK.

Correspondence to Sister Dorothy Wicke at Overton Surgery

To determine whether patients read and remembered health promotion messages displayed in waiting rooms, 600 patients in a UK general practice were given a self-complete questionnaire. Two notice-boards carried between 1 to 4 topics over four study periods. Three-hundred and twenty-seven (55%) of subjects responded. Twenty-two per cent recalled at least one topic. Increasing the number of topics did not in crease the overall impact of the notice-boards. The numbers of patients recalling a topic remained constant, but increasing the number of topics reduced the number remembering each individual topic. Patients aged over 60 years were less likely to recall topics, but waiting time, gender and health professional seen had no effect on results. Very few patients (<10%) read or took health promotion leaflets. These results suggest that the role of waiting room notice-boards should be reassessed. More modern methods of communication such as electronic notice-boards or videos could be used. However, the waiting room might best function not as an area where a captive audience can be bombarded with health promotion messages, but rather as a place for relaxation before consulting a health professional, making patients more receptive to health advice in the consultation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Int J STD AIDSHome page
A. Khan, D. Plummer, R. Hussain, and V. Minichiello
Preventing sexually transmissible infections in Australian general practice
Int J STD AIDS, July 1, 2008; 19(7): 459 - 463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
B. M. McGrath and R. P. Tempier
Is the Waiting Room a Classroom?
Psychiatr Serv, July 1, 2003; 54(7): 1043 - 1043.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
C. Bethell, C. Peck, and E. Schor
Assessing Health System Provision of Well-Child Care: The Promoting Healthy Development Survey
Pediatrics, May 1, 2001; 107(5): 1084 - 1094.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
F. P. Glascoe, F. Oberklaid, P. H. Dworkin, and F. Trimm
Brief Approaches to Educating Patients and Parents in Primary Care
Pediatrics, June 1, 1998; 101 (6): e10 - e10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.