Family Practice Vol. 12, No. 1, 66-69
© Oxford University Press 1995
research-article |
Intruders in the consultation
Department of General Practice, University of Glasgow, Woodside Health Centre Barr Street, Glasgow G20 7LR, UK
A confidential consultation is the essence of family practice. That confidentiality is currently under attack from a number of disruptive influences. Several of these are physical intruders: telephone calls, undergraduate and postgraduate students, video recorders, computers, guidelines, protocols and health promotion activities. The potential benefits of each of these is analysed to elucidate why they have been allowed into consultations. Their drawbacks in the light of current published evidence is presented. Conditions which make intrusions permissible are proposed and practical suggestions are made about how to minimise their impact.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Pearce, S. Trumble, M. Arnold, K. Dwan, and C. Phillips Computers in the new consultation: within the first minute Fam. Pract., June 1, 2008; 25(3): 202 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Makoul, R. H. Curry, and P. C. Tang The Use of Electronic Medical Records: Communication Patterns in Outpatient Encounters J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2001; 8(6): 610 - 615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hajioff Computerized decision support systems: an overview Health Informatics Journal, March 1, 1998; 4(1): 23 - 28. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||


