Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (36)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fijten, G. H
Right arrow Articles by Knottnerus, J A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fijten, G. H
Right arrow Articles by Knottnerus, J A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 12, No. 3, 279-286
© Oxford University Press 1995


research-article

Predictive value of signs and symptoms for colorectal cancer in patients with rectal bleeding in general practice

Gerda H Fijten, Richard Starmans*, Jean WM Muris*, Hubert JA Schouten**, Geert H Blijham{dagger} and J André Knottnerus*

Diagnostic Coordination Centre, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands
*Department of General Practice, University of Limburg Maastricht, The Netherlands
**Department of Methodology and Statistics, University of Limburg Maastricht, The Netherlands
{dagger}Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Utrecht, The Netherlands

Correspondence to G H Fijten, Department of General Practice, Ryksuniversiteit Limburg, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands

The aim of the study is to determine the diagnostic value of (combinations of) signs, symptoms and simple laboratory test results for colorectal cancer in patients with rectal bleeding presenting in general practice. Initial complaints and findings were compared with the final diagnoses based on clinical follow-up after at least 1 year. Patients studied were those presenting overt rectal bleeding to the general practitioner (83 GPs in the South of the Netherlands). Outcome measures are sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, odds ratios and a predicition model derived from multiple logistic regression analysis. Age, change in bowel habit and blood mixed with or on stool show a statistically significant independent value in the discrimination between patients with a low and those with a high probability of colorectal cancer. Many other variables did not show predictive value. The prediction model has a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 90%. Although the number of patients with colorectal cancer is small (n=9) it was possible to identify three characteristics which can be helpful in the prediction of presence or absence of colorectal cancer in general practice. Application of the model presented might prevent 90% of ‘unnecessary’ invasive diagnostic procedures for patients with rectal bleeding who do not have colorectal cancer (true negative). Testing the performance of the model in other general practice populations is recommended.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
R. Jones, R. Latinovic, J. Charlton, and M. C Gulliford
Alarm symptoms in early diagnosis of cancer in primary care: cohort study using General Practice Research Database
BMJ, May 19, 2007; 334(7602): 1040 - 1040.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. du Toit, W. Hamilton, and K. Barraclough
Risk in primary care of colorectal cancer from new onset rectal bleeding: 10 year prospective study
BMJ, July 8, 2006; 333(7558): 69 - 70.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
P Moayyedi
Bringing science to the art of diagnosis
Gut, May 1, 2004; 53(5): 627 - 628.
[Full Text]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
W. Hamilton and D. Sharp
Diagnosis of colorectal cancer in primary care: the evidence base for guidelines
Fam. Pract., February 1, 2004; 21(1): 99 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
J Mathew, P Shankar, and I M Aldean
Audit on flexible sigmoidoscopy for rectal bleeding in a district general hospital: are we over-loading the resources?
Postgrad. Med. J., January 1, 2004; 80(939): 38 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
M R Thompson, B G Ellis, and I Heath
Identifying patients at low risk of bowel cancer: Authors' reply
BMJ, October 11, 2003; 327(7419): 871 - 872.
[Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
W. T Hamilton, A. P Round, D. Sharp, and T. Peters
GPs can separate oncological wheat from chaff
BMJ, February 15, 2003; 326(7385): 397 - 397.
[Full Text]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
A Leslie and R J C Steele
Management of colorectal cancer
Postgrad. Med. J., August 1, 2002; 78(922): 473 - 478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. D. Lewis, A. Brown, A. R. Localio, and J. S. Schwartz
Initial Evaluation of Rectal Bleeding in Young Persons: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Ann Intern Med, January 15, 2002; 136(2): 99 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
R. Jones, G. Rubin, and P. Hungin
Is the two week rule for cancer referrals working?
BMJ, June 30, 2001; 322(7302): 1555 - 1556.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
T. Fahey, A. Montgomery, K. Schroeder, W.-C. Leung, F. Buntinx, H. Wauters, and V. Van Casteren
Rectal bleeding and colorectal cancer
BMJ, March 10, 2001; 322(7286): 610 - 610.
[Full Text]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
L. G. van Berkestijn, M. R Kastein, A. Lodder, R. A de Melker, and M.-L. Bartelink
Do better quality consultations result in better health? Relationship between quality of consultations and health status of patients with non-acute abdominal complaints in general practice
Fam. Pract., December 1, 1999; 16(6): 566 - 572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.