Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hopton, J. L
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hopton, J. L
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 12, No. 4, 452-460
© Oxford University Press 1995

other

Measuring psychological well-being. The Adapted General Well-being Index in a primary care setting: a test of validity

Jane L Hopton, Sonja M Hunt, Christopher Shiels and Catrin Smith

Department of General Practice, University of Edinburgh 20 West Richmond Street, Edinburgh EH8 9DX, UK

The measurement of health outcomes is central to the development of health services. Many acute and chronic illnesses and health interventions have implications for mental health. This study tests the validity of a 22 item measure of psychological well-being, the adapted general well-being index (AGWBI). A postal health survey, including the AGWBI, was sent to a 10% random sample of patients aged 16 or over drawn from the computerized list of one general practice. Two hundred and sixty-six respondents returned questionnaires (a response rate of 76%). The AGWBI was fully completed by 94% (249) of the respondents who returned their questionnaires. Only respondents who fully completed the AGWBI are included in the analysis. The AGWBI significantly discriminated people with a limiting long term illness, those reporting suffering from anxiety, depression or bad nerves, users of general practitioner services over the previous two weeks and respondents reporting taking antidepressants, tranquillizers or sleeping tablets. It was also able to discriminate respondents with psychosocial difficulties in a small sub-sample who reported that they were in excellent health and did not have a limiting long term health problem or psychological illness. The results are broadly supportive of the validity of the AGWBI and suggest it may be appropriate for use in the evaluation of several developing areas of primary care. Further research is needed to test concurrent validity, responsiveness and to establish population norms.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 NeurologyHome page
R. B. Lipton, M. E. Bigal, and W. F. Stewart
Clinical trials of acute treatments for migraine including multiple attack studies of pain, disability, and health-related quality of life
Neurology, December 29, 2005; 65(12_suppl_4): S50 - S58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.