Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malterud, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malterud, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 12, No. 4, 476-481
© Oxford University Press 1995

other

Action research—a strategy for evaluation of medical interventions

Kirsti Malterud

Division for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen Ulriksdal 8c, N-5009 Bergen, Norway

Medical intervention commonly addresses issues which can rarely be controlled and measured experimentally. The zeal for standardization of the intervention may lead to premature closure of a development process, in which the intervention method and its implementation are omitted from systematic evaluation. However, evaluation strategies other than the experimental ones do exist and can overcome these limitations. Action research is presented as an alternative approach for evaluation of medical interventions. This strategy denotes the study of a social situation, intended to improve the quality of action. The two central concerns-improvements in practice and increased knowledge and understanding—are linked together in an integrated and dynamic cycle of activities, in which each phase learns from the previous one and in turn shapes the next. The stages of research involve problem identification, planning, action and evaluation. A model for medical action research, intended to facilitate evaluation of every step, is presented and discussed, illustrated by an example from primary health care research. Evaluation must account for the following elements of the process: problem identification, summarizing previous experience, determining the aims of intervention, planning and development of the intervention method, design and articulation of the intervention strategy, implementation of action, and redefining the problem. Potentials and limitations of the action research strategy are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Scand J Public HealthHome page
S. Steihaug, B. Ahlsen, and K. Malterud
"I am allowed to be myself ' ' : women with chronic muscular pain being recognized
Scand J Public Health, October 1, 2002; 30(4): 281 - 287.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qual Health ResHome page
B. Morrison and R. Lilford
How can Action Research Apply to Health Services?
Qual Health Res, July 1, 2001; 11(4): 436 - 449.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Fam PractHome page
H. Hollnagel, K. Malterud, and K. Witt
Men's self-assessed personal health resources: approaching patients' strong points in general practice
Fam. Pract., December 1, 2000; 17(6): 529 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.