Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hobbs, F. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kenkre, J. E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hobbs, F. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kenkre, J. E
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 13, No. 2, 133-137
© Oxford University Press 1996

research-article

A prospective controlled trial of computerized decision support for lipid management in primary care

FD Richard Hobbs, Brendan C Delaney, Andrew Carson and Joyce E Kenkre

Department of General Practice, University of Birmingham, Medical School Vincent Drive, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the uptake and effect in primary care of a computerized decision support system (DSS) for the management of hyperlipidaemia.

METHOD: A prospective controlled trial was conducted in 25 practices covering a population of 150 000 in the city of Birmingham. The Primed system, a specialist developed, rule based DSS for general practice, was introduced prospectively after a 3-month baseline data collection. The main outcome measures were nine months' data on prescribing of lipid lowering agents; use of laboratory tests; and referrals to secondary care for the investigation of hyperlipidaemia.

RESULTS: System use was lower than expected. A shift was observed towards requests for appropriate follow-up of previously abnormal lipid results and a greater emphasis on full lipid profiles, in line with the DSS guidelines. Referrals showed a 55% decrease on those expected (NS). The prescribing evaluation revealed a large variation between practices, but no significant alteration following system use. Views of users favoured decision support as a concept, but criticised technical problems with the system.

CONCLUSIONS: Greater integration of DSS software and practice based data handling systems is needed. The mode of data capture, and hence both the content and form of knowledge representation, in DSS must take greater account of the primary care consultation process if such systems are to be of use to practitioners.

Keywords. Computerized decision support, hyperlipidaemia, primary care, prospective controlled trial.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arch Intern MedHome page
D. A. Fitzmaurice, F. D. R. Hobbs, E. T. Murray, R. L. Holder, T. F. Allan, and P. E. Rose
Oral Anticoagulation Management in Primary Care With the Use of Computerized Decision Support and Near-Patient Testing: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Arch Intern Med, August 14, 2000; 160(15): 2343 - 2348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
B. C Delaney, D. A Fitzmaurice, A. Riaz, and F D R. Hobbs
Can computerised decision support systems deliver improved quality in primary care?
BMJ, November 13, 1999; 319(7220): 1281 - 1281.
[Full Text]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
D. L. Hunt, R. B. Haynes, S. E. Hanna, and K. Smith
Effects of Computer-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems on Physician Performance and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review
JAMA, October 21, 1998; 280(15): 1339 - 1346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.