Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wright, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wright, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 13, No. 3, 259-263
© Oxford University Press 1996

research-article

General practitioners' attitudes to variations in referral rates and how these could be managed

John Wright and John Wilkinson

Nuffield Institute for Health 71-75 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS2 9PL, UK

BACKGROUND: Hospital referral rates have received widespread attention for both clinical and economic reasons.

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to find out the views of general practitioners in North Yorkshire on current arrangements for the feedback of routine referral data, perceived factors that influenced their referral behaviour and changes that might help their referral decisions.

METHOD: Survey questions were chosen from the issues raised during semi-structured interviews with 11 selected practices. A postal questionnaire was sent to all 114 general practices in North Yorkshire.

RESULTS: A 60% (68/114) response rate was obtained from the postal questionnaire. The majority of practices agreed that the referral information supplied by them was accurate (77%) and that the feedback of this data was useful (66%). Uncertainty of diagnosis/management and patient pressure were the two most commonly agreed factors that were suggested as influencing referral behaviour. Training in procedures and use of clinical guidelines were the most popular changes chosen as being helpful in referral decision making.

CONCLUSIONS: The feedback of routine referral data is considered accurate and useful, and should continue. Expanding opportunities for the training of general practitioners in specific skills and the development of clinical guidelines for the management and referral of commonly suggested areas would be helpful to general practitioners in making referral decisions.

Keywords. Hospital referrals, information feedback, clinical guidelines.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BMJHome page
D. Keene
Referral management centres: More Hackney carriage than Trojan horse
BMJ, April 22, 2006; 332(7547): 975 - 975.
[Full Text]

Home page
 Fam PractHome page
C. A O'Donnell
Variation in GP referral rates: what can we learn from the literature?
Fam. Pract., December 1, 2000; 17(6): 462 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.