Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Little, P.
Right arrow Articles by Williamson, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Little, P.
Right arrow Articles by Williamson, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 13, No. 3, 317-321
© Oxford University Press 1996


research-article

Sore throat management in general practice

Paul Little and Ian Williamson

Primary Medical Care, Aldermoor Health Centre Aldermoor Close, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK

This paper discusses primary care management of sore throat in the context of recent national ‘consensus’ guidelines from the Drugs and Therapeutics Bulletin. The guidelines advise taking a throat swab, using typical clinical features where swabs are not available, and suggest that antibiotics shorten the duration of symptoms and prevent complications. Systematic reviews and individual studies indicate that the evidence for prescribing antibiotics for most presentations of sore throat in general practice is marginal, and the benefits are probably outweighed by the likely costs of antibiotics. Using clinical scorecards or symptom clusters to identify individuals who would benefit from treatment is insensitive with low predictive value, although inexpensive. Using throat swabs as a gold standard for diagnosis is inappropriate since they are neither very specific nor sensitive, and will greatly increase costs of management. The relative lack of evidence for the efficacy of antibiotics and for the use of throat swabs from primary care research, and also an unbalanced perspective of dangers and complications related predominantly to a secondary care setting, underlines the problem of achieving valid consensus guidelines. Guidelines not firmly based on evidence appropriate to the intended setting are more likely to be received sceptically and hinder getting research into practice.

Keywords. Sore throat, clinical guidelines, tonsilitis, pharyngitis, throat swab.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
InnovAiTHome page
B. M. Stubbs and A. L. Isaacs
Acute tonsillitis
InnovAiT, January 1, 2009; 2(1): 50 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
X. Duval, C. Leport, and N. Danchin
The new American Heart Association guidelines on the prevention of infective endocarditis: culmination of a long process of thought
Heart, June 1, 2008; 94(6): 715 - 716.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
S. Kumar, P. Little, and N. Britten
Why do general practitioners prescribe antibiotics for sore throat? Grounded theory interview study
BMJ, January 18, 2003; 326(7381): 138 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
S. Rollnick, C. Seale, M. Rees, C. Butler, P. Kinnersley, and L. Anderson
Inside the routine general practice consultation: an observational study of consultations for sore throats
Fam. Pract., October 1, 2001; 18(5): 506 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
C. C. Butler, P. Kinnersley, H. Prout, S. Rollnick, A. Edwards, and G. Elwyn
Antibiotics and shared decision-making in primary care
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2001; 48(3): 435 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
C. M Cox and M. Jones
Is it possible to decrease antibiotic prescribing in primary care? An analysis of outcomes in the management of patients with sore throats
Fam. Pract., January 1, 2001; 18(1): 9 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
A. Graham and T. Fahey
Evidence based case report: Sore throat: diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas
BMJ, July 17, 1999; 319(7203): 173 - 174.
[Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
C. C Butler, S. Rollnick, R. Pill, F. Maggs-Rapport, and N. Stott
Understanding the culture of prescribing: qualitative study of general practitioners' and patients' perceptions of antibiotics for sore throats
BMJ, September 5, 1998; 317(7159): 637 - 642.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
R. Simo, A. Pahade, A. Belloso, P. Little, I. Williamson, C. Gould, A.-L. Kinmonth, M. Gantley, and G. Warner
Trial of prescribing strategies for sore throat
BMJ, February 14, 1998; 316(7131): 631b - 631.
[Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
P Little, C Gould, I Williamson, G Warner, M Gantley, and A L Kinmonth
Reattendance and complications in a randomised trial of prescribing strategies for sore throat: the medicalising effect of prescribing antibiotics
BMJ, August 9, 1997; 315(7104): 350 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.