Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dowell, A.
Right arrow Articles by Katbamna, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dowell, A.
Right arrow Articles by Katbamna, S
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 13, No. 4, 357-362
© Oxford University Press 1996

research-article

Prevention in practice: results of a 2-year follow-up of routine health promotion interventions in general practice

AC Dowell, SR Hilton*, JM Bland*, T Harris*, DR Jones** and S Katbamna

Centre for research in Primary Care, University of Leeds 33/32 Hyde Terrace, Leeds LS2 9LN, UK
*Department of General Practice and Public Health Sciences, St. Hospital Medical School London, UK
**Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Leicester Leicester, UK

BACKGROUND.: The effectiveness of health promotion activity in general practice on risk factor reduction for coronary heart disease remains the subject of active debate.

OBJECTIVE.: The study aimed to assess the impact of practice-based health check-ups on health behaviours over a 2-year period.

METHOD.: A general practice cohort of 7123 patients from 18 practices was surveyed. Eight hundred and forty (12%) patients had been offered a heafth check within a 12-month period from September 1992 and 621 (9%) received one. Two hundred and fifty patients (40%) were asked back for follow-up after their health check.

RESULTS.: Over a 2-year period there was no difference in smoking cessation, alcohol consumption, weight loss nor the amount of exercise taken between those who attended for a health check and those who did not. The food score chosen to assess dietary change (Oxcheck) showed a statistically significant 1.16-point rise for the whole sample over the survey period. There was a significant difference in mean food score change between heafth check attenders and non-attenders (Mann-Whitney U test: P << 0.002). Maintenance of dietary improvement over a 2-year period was not affected by health check attendance.

CONCLUSIONS.: This study confirms the low impact of health checks on the self reported modification of cardiovascular risk factors and shows that maintenance of appropriate health behaviour change is no more likely in those who have received a health check.

Keywords. Health promotion, general practice.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BMJHome page
J. T. Hart
A few lessons in screening for Gordon Brown
BMJ, January 19, 2008; 336(7636): 123 - 123.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
T. Coleman, A. T Wynn, K. Stevenson, and F. Cheater
Qualitative study of pilot payment aimed at increasing general practitioners' antismoking advice to smokers
BMJ, August 25, 2001; 323(7310): 432 - 432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.