Family Practice, Vol 14, 302-306, Copyright © 1997 by World Organization of Family Doctors
AR White, KL Resch and E Ernst
BACKGROUND: Information about use and attitudes of GPs towards
complementary medicine is required in order to inform the debate about its
place within mainstream medicine. There is evidence that public use of
complementary medicine is particularly high in the South-West of England.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the use of, and attitudes towards,
complementary medicine among GPs. METHODS: A questionnaire survey was
performed of all primary care physicians working in the health service in
Devon and Cornwall. RESULTS: Replies were received from 461 GPs, a response
rate of 47%. A total of 314 GPs (68%, range 32-85%) had been involved in
complementary medicine in some way during the previous week. One or other
form of complementary medicine was practised by 74 of the respondents
(16%), the two most common being homoeopathy (5.9%) and acupuncture (4.3%).
In addition, 115 of the respondents (25%) had referred at least one patient
to a complementary therapist in the previous week, and 253 (55%) had
endorsed or recommended treatment with complementary medicine.
Chiropractic, acupuncture and osteopathy were rated as the three most
effective therapies, and the majority of respondents believed that these
three therapies should be funded by the health service. A total of 176
(38%) of respondents reported adverse effects, most commonly after
manipulation. CONCLUSION: Over two-thirds of the GPs in Devon and Cornwall
who responded to the survey had been involved with complementary medicine
in some way during the previous week. This figure is higher than the
national average. The majority of respondents believed that acupuncture,
chiropractic and osteopathy were effective and should be funded by the NHS.
ORIGINAL CLINICAL RESEARCH
Complementary medicine: use and attitudes among GPs
Department of Complementary Medicine, Postgraduate Medical School, University of Exeter, UK.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Joos, B. Musselmann, and J. Szecsenyi Integration of Complementary and Alternative Medicine into Family Practices in Germany: Results of a National Survey Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., March 17, 2009; (2009) nep019v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Fadlon Meridians, Chakras and Psycho-Neuro-Immunology: The Dematerializing Body and the Domestication of Alternative Medicine Body Society, December 1, 2004; 10(4): 69 - 86. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Mann, S. Gaylord, and S. Norton Moving Toward Integrative Care: Rationales, Models, and Steps for Conventional-Care Providers Complementary Health Practice Review, October 1, 2004; 9(3): 155 - 172. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-I. Lee, Y.-H. Khang, M.-S. Lee, and W. Kang Knowledge of, Attitudes Toward, and Experience of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Western Medicine- and Oriental Medicine-Trained Physicians in Korea Am J Public Health, December 1, 2002; 92(12): 1994 - 2000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. Berman, R. B. Bausell, and W.-L. Lee Use and Referral Patterns for 22 Complementary and Alternative Medical Therapies by Members of the American College of Rheumatology: Results of a National Survey Arch Intern Med, April 8, 2002; 162(7): 766 - 770. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Rosenbaum, N. L. Nisly, K. J. Ferguson, and E. W. Kligman Academic Physicians and Complementary and Alternative Medicine: An Institutional Survey American Journal of Medical Quality, January 1, 2002; 17(1): 3 - 9. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Kemper, R. Sarah, L. MPH, E. Silver-Highfield, L.{s. E. Xiarhos, L. Barnes, and C. Berde On Pins and Needles? Pediatric Pain Patients' Experience With Acupuncture Pediatrics, April 1, 2000; 105(4): 941 - 947. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Astin, A. Marie, K. R. Pelletier, E. Hansen, and W. L. Haskell A Review of the Incorporation of Complementary and Alternative Medicine by Mainstream Physicians Arch Intern Med, November 23, 1998; 158(21): 2303 - 2310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||






