Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, A.
Right arrow Articles by Donaldson, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scott, A.
Right arrow Articles by Donaldson, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice, Vol 15, 216-222, Copyright © 1998 by World Organization of Family Doctors

ORIGINAL CLINICAL RESEARCH

Evaluating innovation in general practice: a pragmatic framework using programme budgeting and marginal analysis

A Scott, N Currie and C Donaldson
Health Economics Research Unit, Department of Public Health, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, UK.

BACKGROUND: Innovation in primary care in the UK, in terms of new service developments, is occurring at a fast pace. However, little information is available on the costs and benefits of these changes. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to illustrate the use of programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) as a framework for evaluating innovation in primary care, using an example of practice-based diabetes care. The aim was to examine changes in the use of practice resources and the changes in benefits to patients, following the introduction of a diabetes clinic. METHODS: PBMA is a form of pragmatic economic evaluation combining practice data for the 'before' period and data from the literature to model the 'after' period. RESULTS: In 1995/6, the total amount of resources devoted to diabetes care in the two practices was 145813 pound sterling (634 pound sterling per patient). Of this sum, 62% was allocated to out-patient visits, 28% to prescribing, 5% to hospital admissions, 2% to GP consultations and 2% to tests. The literature suggests that a nurse-run diabetes clinic would result in similar health outcomes and better access for patients. The introduction of such a clinic could potentially save each practice between 2000 pound sterling and 16000 pound sterling per year. This result takes into account a wide range of assumptions about changes in resource use, but does depend on the findings of previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that PBMA is a useful framework for helping practices be accountable and make 'evidence- based' decisions about service innovations in primary care.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.