Family Practice, Vol 15, 275-281, Copyright © 1998 by World Organization of Family Doctors
EL Feldman, A Robbins and A Jaffe
The term "minor depression" has had several accepted definitions with
differing diagnostic criteria. A review of papers published during the
period 1991-1996, in which minor depression was a component of the study,
demonstrates the extent of these differences. The heterogeneity of
definitions of minor depression has been an obstacle to research on a
mental disorder that appears to have a high prevalence and causes
significant functional disability. As a result of these differing
definitions, there is uncertainty about its natural history and prevalence,
and whether therapy is beneficial. Agreement on a standard definition is
necessary for investigations that are required to describe adequately these
components of minor depression. This paper details the variety of
definitions of minor depression and suggests use of the research diagnostic
criteria published in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, fourth edition
(DSM-IV) in future research.
REVIEWS
Selections from current literature: minor depression
Department of Family Medicine, State University of New York at Stony Brook, 11794-8461, USA.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. S. Cornford, A. Hill, and J. Reilly How patients with depressive symptoms view their condition: a qualitative study Fam. Pract., August 1, 2007; 24(4): 358 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Thomas-MacLean and J. M. Stoppard Physicians' Constructions of Depression: Inside/Outside the Boundaries of Medicalization Health (London) , July 1, 2004; 8(3): 275 - 293. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Fortney, K. Rost, M. Zhang, and J. Pyne The Relationship Between Quality and Outcomes in Routine Depression Care Psychiatr Serv, January 1, 2001; 52(1): 56 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


