Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wright, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wright, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice, Vol 15, 426-430, Copyright © 1998 by World Organization of Family Doctors

ORIGINAL CLINICAL RESEARCH

Factors affecting practice nurse involvement in follow-up care of patients following myocardial infarction

L Wright, S Griffin and F Bradley
Primary Medical Care, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close.

BACKGROUND: Preventive care can reduce the morbidity and mortality of patients following myocardial infarction. Recent evidence has shown that such care is not being provided effectively. The involvement of practice nurses has been proposed as a means of improving the completeness of follow-up and the quality of preventive care. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the extent to which follow-up care for people discharged from hospital after a myocardial infarction is currently being undertaken by practice nurses and to assess the factors influencing the provision of such care and the nurses' attitudes towards this extended role. METHOD: Postal questionnaires were sent to 183 practice nurses working in general practices in the Southampton and South-West Hampshire Health District; 121 nurses responded (66%), representing 58 out of 64 practices surveyed (91%). RESULTS: The majority of responding practice nurses (55%, 95% CI 47-64%) had hospital experience of caring for patients with ischaemic heart disease, and most (83%, 95% CI 76-89%) believed that they played a key role in follow-up care of patients following myocardial infarction. In the absence of external support from a cardiac liaison nurse, few nurses (26%, 95% CI 16-41%) provide such care at present and only 21% work in practices with a register of myocardial infarction patients. Factors predicting the provision of follow-up care are having adequate time (odds ratio 4.59, 95% CI 1.66-12.7), the support of a cardiac liaison nurse (odds ratio 3.07, 95% CI 1.28-7.34) and GP colleagues (odds ratio 3.38, 95% CI 1.38-8.23), training in consultation skills (odds ratio 7.25, 95% CI 2.08-25.3), fundholding (odds ratio 3.11, 95% CI 1.26-7.69) and the confidence and knowledge of the practice nurse (odds ratios and 95% CIs respectively: 2.84, 1.18-6.83 and 2.80, 1.13- 6.89). CONCLUSION: Most practice nurses are enthusiastic and have some of the necessary experience to provide follow-up care for patients who have experienced a myocardial infarction. Yet few currently provide it. The most important organizational incentives for providing such care are further training and the support of GPs and the cardiac liaison nurse.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.