Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, M. N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, M. N
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 16, No. 1, 33-38
© Oxford University Press 1999

How well do GPs and hospital consultants work together? A survey of the professional relationship

Martin N Marshall

Institute of General Practice, Postgraduate Medical School, University of Exeter, Barrack Road, Exeter EX2 5DW, UK.

Background. The professional relationship between GPs and hospital consultants (sometimes referred to as ‘specialists’) is important in a healthcare system based upon the generalist as the first point of contact for patients and the gate-keeper for hospital services. This relationship has been the subject of considerable interest over the years, but little empirical research.

Objectives. We aimed to compare the attitudes of GPs and specialists to key issues, and to produce a validated objective measure of their ability to work together.

Methods. We conducted a Likert-style survey based upon statements made in qualitative interviews with GPs and specialists working in the South and West of England. The questionnaire was modified and validated during a multi-stage pilot and was distributed to a stratified random sample of 800 clinicians.

Results. GPs and specialists demonstrate a good level of agreement, mutual understanding and respect, though there are significant differences between the two branches of the profession in terms of attitude towards financial parity and direct access to special investigations.

Conclusions. A measure of the ability of GPs and specialists to work together has been developed, with acceptable internal consistency and validity. It may be used in other geographical areas to assess a relationship which is central to the efficient and effective operation of the National Health Service.

Keywords. GP, professional relationship, specialist..


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.