Family Practice Vol. 16, No. 3, 305-311
© Oxford University Press 1999
Action research: a useful method of promoting change in primary care?
Division of General Practice, School of Community Health Sciences, The Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH and
a Division of Child Health, School of Human Development, University of Nottingham, The Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
Background. Action research has been used successfully to promote change in disciplines other than medicine, but there are few examples of its use in primary care.
Objective. We aimed to discuss the benefits and difficulties of using action research in primary care using the example of child health surveillance provision in general practice.
Methods. Twenty-eight general practices were randomly allocated into two groups. Action research was used to promote change in 14 practices by facilitating practice meetings and by providing written feedback. The other 14 practices received written feedback alone. The two groups of practices were compared using the following: (i) semi-structured interviews with one health visitor and GP from each practice; (ii) observation of baby clinics; (iii) questionnaires to parents; and (iv) return rates of child health surveillance reviews from the personal child health record.
Results. All 14 practices in the action research arm of the study met as individual practice teams and decided to make changes to their provision of child health surveillance. Ten practices audited their child health surveillance as a result. More health visitors in the action research practices than in the comparison practices reported changes to child health surveillance, audit, communication and use of the personal child health record. The majority of health visitors and GPs thought involvement in the action research process was beneficial. However, we were unable to show a statistically significant difference between the two groups of practices in baby clinic provision, parent satisfaction or the return rate of child health surveillance reviews.
Conclusion. Our study suggests that action research is a successful method of promoting change in primary care. However, measuring the impact of change is difficult.
Keywords. Action research, primary health care, quality of care.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. I. Loureiro, A. R. Goes, G. Paim da Camara, M. Goncalves-Pereira, T. Maia, and L. Saboga Nunes Priorities for mental health promotion during pregnancy and infancy in primary health care Global Health Promotion, March 1, 2009; 16(1): 29 - 38. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. J. Mendenhall and W. J. Doherty Partners in Diabetes: Action research in a primary care setting Action Research, December 1, 2007; 5(4): 378 - 406. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E C Goyder, L Blank, E Ellis, A Furber, J Peters, K Sartain, and C Massey Reducing inequalities in access to health care: developing a toolkit through action research Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2005; 14(5): 336 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Whitehead, A. Taket, and P. Smith Action research in health promotion Health Education Journal, January 1, 2003; 62(1): 5 - 22. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. H. Bellman Commentary Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., January 1, 2001; 7(1): 40 - 42. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. BLAIR Public health: The need for and the role of a coordinator in child health surveillance/promotion Arch. Dis. Child., January 1, 2001; 84(1): 1 - 5. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|