Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van den Berg, P. J
Right arrow Articles by Hoes, A. W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van den Berg, P. J
Right arrow Articles by Hoes, A. W
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 16, No. 4, 389-394
© Oxford University Press 1999

Cardiovascular health check in the elderly in one general practice: does it offer new information and lead to interventions?

Pieter J van den Berg, Cees L van Dalsen, Richard AM de Rooij, Ad Prins and Arno W Hoes

Department of General Practice, Erasmus University Rotterdam and aDepartment of General Practice and Julius Center for Patient-Oriented Research, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

Background. Prevention of cardiovascular disease in the elderly is becoming increasingly important. GPs are in a unique position to initiate preventive interventions in this age group. However, it is not clear which strategy a GP should follow to identify patients at increased cardiovascular risk—case finding or screening.

Objective. We aimed to assess the value of a single cardiovascular health check compared with a normal care case finding and to investigate the diagnostic or therapeutic consequences of detecting new cardiovascular risk indicators.

Methods. In 1991, 1002 persons aged 60 years and over, enlisted in one general practice, were invited. Of the 805 subjects who responded (80%), the cardiovascular risk profile was determined by a research physician. The proportion of newly detected cardiovascular risk indicators was the main outcome measure. A risk indicator was considered newly detected when it was not mentioned in the GP's summary of the patient record, which had been checked by the patient for its completeness. The patient records of participants with newly detected hypertension, diabetes or hypercholesterolaemia were systematically reviewed to detect diagnostic and therapeutic interventions by the GP.

Results. In 25.1% of the participants, one or more cardiovascular risk indicators were found which were previously unknown to the GP, including 38 (4.7%) cases of hypertension, 82 (10%) cases of isolated systolic hypertension, 14 (1.7%) cases of diabetes mellitus and 63 (7.8%) cases of hypercholesterolaemia. On the basis of these findings, the GP initiated therapeutic interventions in almost all subjects with newly detected diabetes. However, reports of newly detected hypertension or high cholesterol levels were usually not followed by an intervention.

Conclusion. A single cardiovascular health check in the elderly can detect a considerable number of risk indicators that are unknown to a patient's GP. In most cases, however, the detection of hypertension or cholesterol >=6.5 mmol/l did not lead to interventions by the GP. More efforts are needed to ensure that the beneficial effects of these interventions are not limited to participants in clinical trials but can be extended to patients in general practice.

Keywords. Aged, cardiovascular disease/prevention and control, family practice..


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.