Family Practice Vol. 16, No. 4, 420-425
© Oxford University Press 1999
The ‘new genetics’ and primary care: GPs' views on their role and their educational needs
Cancer Research Campaign Primary Care Education Research Group, Division of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Oxford, Institute of Health Sciences, Headington OX3 7LF,
a School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent St, Sheffield S1 4DA,
b School of Community Health Sciences, Division of General Practice, University of Nottingham, Medical School, Queens Medical Centre, Clifton Boulevard, Nottingham NG7 2UH and
c Cancer Research Campaign Primary Care Oncology Research Fellow, Division of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Oxford, Institute of Health Sciences, Headington OX3 7LF, UK.
Background. Given the limited specialist resources available to cope with the rising demand for genetic services, it has been proposed that at least some of these services are provided by primary care in the future.
Objective. We aimed to explore GPs' attitudes towards new developments in genetics, to establish the role they envisage for primary care and to clearly define the education, information and training needed to support them in this role.
Methods. We carried out a qualitative study with GPs using four focus groups (26 GPs) and 15 individual semi-structured interviews.
Results. GPs perceive genetics as an important and increasingly relevant topic for primary care. Views on the appropriate level of involvement for primary care are mixed. GPs currently lack the relevant knowledge and skills to manage patients concerned about their family history. Other potential barriers to increasing primary care involvement included the time and costs involved, and ethical and legal concerns.
Conclusion. If primary care is to become more involved in the delivery of genetic services in the future, then a major educational effort is required to raise awareness of the potential scope and limitations of new developments.
Keywords. Family history, focus groups, genetic risk assessment, primary health care, new genetics..
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. L. Trotter and H. M. Martin Family History in Pediatric Primary Care Pediatrics, September 1, 2007; 120(SUPPLEMENT_2): S60 - S65. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Qureshi, S. Armstrong, and B. Modell GPs' opinions of their role in prenatal genetic services: a cross-sectional survey Fam. Pract., February 1, 2006; 23(1): 106 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Knottnerus Community genetics and community medicine Fam. Pract., October 1, 2003; 20(5): 601 - 606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. M Aalfs, E. M. Smets, H. C. de Haes, and N. J Leschot Referral for genetic counselling during pregnancy: limited alertness and awareness about genetic risk factors among GPs Fam. Pract., April 1, 2003; 20(2): 135 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I.M van Langen, E Birnie, N.J Leschot, G.J Bonsel, and A.A.M Wilde Genetic knowledge and counselling skills of Dutch cardiologists: sufficient for the genomics era? Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2003; 24(6): 560 - 566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N Qureshi, R Hapgood, and S Armstrong Continuous medical education approaches for clinical genetics: a postal survey of general practitioners J. Med. Genet., November 1, 2002; 39(11): e69 - 69. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E Watson, A Clements, A Lucassen, P Yudkin, J Mackay, and J Austoker Education improves general practitioner (GP) management of familial breast/ovarian cancer: findings from a cluster randomised controlled trial J. Med. Genet., October 1, 2002; 39(10): 779 - 781. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Shickle, R. Hapgood, and N. Qureshi The genetics liaison nurse role as a means of educating and supporting primary care professionals Fam. Pract., April 1, 2002; 19(2): 193 - 196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Elwyn, R. Iredale, and J. Gray Reactions of GPs to a triage-controlled referral system for cancer genetics Fam. Pract., February 1, 2002; 19(1): 65 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. M. Sweet, T. L. Bradley, and J. A. Westman Identification and Referral of Families at High Risk for Cancer Susceptibility J. Clin. Oncol., January 15, 2002; 20(2): 528 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Bankhead, J. Emery, N. Qureshi, H. Campbell, J. Austoker, and E. Watson New developments in genetics--knowledge, attitudes and information needs of practice nurses Fam. Pract., October 1, 2001; 18(5): 475 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. W Rose, E. Watson, P. Yudkin, J. Emery, M. Murphy, A. Fuller, and A. Lucassen Referral of patients with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer--GPs' knowledge and expectations Fam. Pract., October 1, 2001; 18(5): 487 - 490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. M Walter, A. L. Kinmonth, F. Hyland, P. Murrell, T. M Marteau, and C. Todd Experiences and expectations of the new genetics in relation to familial risk of breast cancer: a comparison of the views of GPs and practice nurses Fam. Pract., October 1, 2001; 18(5): 491 - 494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Emery and S. Hayflick The challenge of integrating genetic medicine into primary care BMJ, April 28, 2001; 322(7293): 1027 - 1030. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Watson, J. Austoker, and A. Lucassen A study of GP referrals to a family cancer clinic for breast/ovarian cancer Fam. Pract., April 1, 2001; 18(2): 131 - 134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Lucassen, E. Watson, J. Harcourt, P. Rose, and J. O'Grady Guidelines for referral to a regional genetics service: GPs respond by referring more appropriate cases Fam. Pract., April 1, 2001; 18(2): 135 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Qureshi, P. Standen, R. Hapgood, and J. Hayes A randomized controlled trial to assess the psychological impact of a family history screening questionnaire in general practice Fam. Pract., January 1, 2001; 18(1): 78 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Elwyn, J. Gray, R. Iredale, D. Donnai, L. Kerzin-Storrar, D. Craufurd, G. Evans, J. Clayton-Smith, H. Kingston, R. Hapgood, et al. Tensions in implementing the new genetics BMJ, July 22, 2000; 321(7255): 240b - 240. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Emery, P. Rose, V. Leggatt, J. Mackay, and J. R W Yates Evaluation of questionnaire on cancer family history in general practice BMJ, January 15, 2000; 320(7228): 186a - 186. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Emery, E. Watson, P. Rose, and A. Andermann A systematic review of the literature exploring the role of primary care in genetic services Fam. Pract., August 1, 1999; 16(4): 426 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|