Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khunti, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khunti, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 16, No. 5, 489-494
© Oxford University Press 1999

Use of multiple methods to determine factors affecting quality of care of patients with diabetes

Kamlesh Khunti

Clinical Governance Research and Development Unit, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK.

Background. The process of care of patients with diabetes is complex; however, GPs are playing a greater role in its management. Despite the research evidence, the quality of care of patients with diabetes is variable. In order to improve care, information is required on the obstacles faced by practices in improving care. Qualitative and quantitative methods can be used for formation of hypotheses and the development of survey procedures. However, to date few examples exist in general practice research on the use of multiple methods using both quantitative and qualitative techniques for hypothesis generation.

Objectives. We aimed to determine information on all factors that may be associated with delivery of care to patients with diabetes.

Methods. Factors for consideration on delivery of diabetes care were generated by multiple qualitative methods including brainstorming with health professionals and patients, a focus group and interviews with key informants which included GPs and practice nurses. Audit data showing variations in care of patients with diabetes were used to stimulate the brainstorming session. A systematic literature search focusing on quality of care of patients with diabetes in primary care was also conducted.

Results. Fifty-four potential factors were identified by multiple methods. Twenty (37.0%) were practice-related factors, 14 (25.9%) were patient-related factors and 20 (37.0%) were organizational factors. A combination of brainstorming and the literature review identified 51 (94.4%) factors. Patients did not identify factors in addition to those identified by other methods.

Conclusion. The complexity of delivery of care to patients with diabetes is reflected in the large number of potential factors identified in this study. This study shows the feasibility of using multiple methods for hypothesis generation. Each evaluation method provided unique data which could not otherwise be easily obtained. This study highlights a way of combining various traditional methods in an attempt to overcome the deficiencies and bias that may occur when using a single method. Similar methods can also be used to generate hypotheses for other exploratory research. An important responsibility of health authorities and primary care groups will be to assess the health needs of their local populations. Multiple methods could also be used to identify and commission services to meet these needs.

Keywords. Diabetes mellitus, methodology, qualitative, quantitative.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
M A Meulepas, J C C Braspenning, W J de Grauw, A E M Lucas, D Wijkel, and R P T M Grol
Patient-oriented intervention in addition to centrally organised checkups improves diabetic patient outcome in primary care
Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2008; 17(5): 324 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
H. Alberti, N. Boudriga, and M. Nabli
"Damm Sokkor": Factors Associated With the Quality of Care of Patients With Diabetes: A study in primary care in Tunisia
Diabetes Care, August 1, 2007; 30(8): 2013 - 2018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
M. A. Meulepas, J. C. Braspenning, W. J. de Grauw, A. E. Lucas, L. Harms, R. P. Akkermans, and R. P. Grol
Logistic support service improves processes and outcomes of diabetes care in general practice
Fam. Pract., February 1, 2007; 24(1): 20 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
C. F. Schaars, P. Denig, W. N. Kasje, R. E. Stewart, B. H.R. Wolffenbuttel, and F. M. Haaijer-Ruskamp
Physician, Organizational, and Patient Factors Associated With Suboptimal Blood Pressure Management in Type 2 Diabetic Patients in Primary Care
Diabetes Care, January 1, 2004; 27(1): 123 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
S M Campbell, M Hann, J Hacker, C Burns, D Oliver, A Thapar, N Mead, D G. Safran, and M O Roland
Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study
BMJ, October 6, 2001; 323(7316): 784 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.