Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (35)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zwar, N.
Right arrow Articles by Kehoe, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zwar, N.
Right arrow Articles by Kehoe, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 16, No. 5, 495-500
© Oxford University Press 1999

Influencing antibiotic prescribing in general practice: a trial of prescriber feedback and management guidelines

Nicholas Zwar, Jael Wolka, Jill Gordonb, Rob Sanson-Fisherc and Linda Kehoe

Royal Australian College of General Practitioners Training Program, PO Box 197, North Ryde NSW 2113, Australia,
a School of Community Medicine, University of New South Wales,
b Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney and
c Faculty of Medicine, University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia.

Background. The extent of use of antibiotics to treat upper respiratory infections in general practice is an area for concern due to the increasing problem of bacterial resistance. Effective educational strategies to promote rational prescribing are needed.

Objectives. We aimed to examine the effectiveness of prescriber feedback and management guidelines in reducing antibiotics prescribing by GP trainees for undifferentiated upper respiratory tract infection, and in improving the choice of antibiotic for tonsillitis/streptococcal pharyngitis. The research tested a stepwise approach to targeting educational input to high prescribers.

Method. General Practice trainees in New South Wales (n = 157) were randomly allocated to a treatment group (n = 78) which received an education intervention on antibiotic use, or to a control group (n = 79) which received an intervention on an unrelated topic. Trainees completed three practice activity surveys, each of 110 consecutive patient encounters, with 6-month intervals between surveys. Prescriber feedback and management guidelines on use of antibiotics for URTI and choice of antibiotic for tonsillitis/streptococcal pharyngitis were delivered in a written form between surveys 1 and 2. An educational outreach visit to high prescribers occurred between surveys 2 and 3. Outcome measures were the rate of antibiotic prescribing for all indications, for URTI and prescribing of select antibiotics for tonsillitis/streptococcal pharyngitis.

Results. Antibiotic prescribing by the intervention group declined over three occasions from 25.0 to 23.3 to 19.7 per 100 URTI problems, while the control group increased from 22.0 to 25.0 to 31.7 per 100 URTI problems (P = 0.002). Prescribing in agreement with accepted guidelines for tonsillitis/streptococcal pharyngitis increased over time in the intervention group from 55.6 to 69.8 to 73.0 per 100 problems, but decreased in the control group from 59.6 to 57.5 to 58.5 (P = 0.05).

Conclusion. Prescriber feedback and management guidelines were shown to influence antibiotic prescribing for URTI and choice of antibiotic for tonsillitis/streptococcal pharyngitis. This study provides a model for targeting educational input to those prescribers who most need to change their behaviour.

Keywords. Antibiotics, feedback, guidelines, prescribing, respiratory tract infections.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. C. van der Wouden and M. M. Kuyvenhoven
Clinical decision support systems and antibiotic prescribing.
JAMA, April 19, 2006; 295(15): 1771 - 1771.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
I. Welschen, M. M Kuyvenhoven, A. W Hoes, and T. J M Verheij
Effectiveness of a multiple intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract symptoms in primary care: randomised controlled trial
BMJ, August 21, 2004; 329(7463): 431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
B. Arroll, T. Kenealy, F. Goodyear-Smith, and N. Kerse
Delayed prescriptions
BMJ, December 13, 2003; 327(7428): 1361 - 1362.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
T. Y. Tan, C. McNulty, A. Charlett, N. Nessa, C. Kelly, and T. Beswick
Laboratory antibiotic susceptibility reporting and antibiotic prescribing in general practice
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2003; 51(2): 379 - 384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
N. Zwar, J. Henderson, H. Britt, K. McGeechan, and G. Yeo
Influencing antibiotic prescribing by prescriber feedback and management guidelines: a 5-year follow-up
Fam. Pract., February 1, 2002; 19(1): 12 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.