Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Barfod, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Barfod, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 16, No. 6, 551-557
© Oxford University Press 1999

Encouraging GPs to undertake screening and a brief intervention in order to reduce problem drinking: a randomized controlled trial

Lars Jørgen Hansen, Niels de Fine Olivarius, Anders Beich and Sverre Barfod

Central Research Unit of General Practice, Panum Institute and Department of General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Panum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Lars J Hansen, Central Research Unit of General Practice, Panum Institute, Blegdamsvej 3, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.

Background. GPs are in a key position to screen the population for problem drinking. However, so far this has not been extensively undertaken in general practice. Thus, studies relating to encouraging the undertaking in general practice of screening and initiating a brief intervention for problem drinking are needed.

Objectives. We aimed to compare three approaches direct mail, telephone contact and academic detailing to encourage GPs to undertake screening and a brief intervention (SBI) for problem drinking.

Methods. A total of 143 GPs in Copenhagen County were randomly assigned to the three approaches. The outcome measures were the proportion of GPs who requested the SBI package (uptake rate) and the fraction of GPs who started using the package (utilization rate). The costs of each approach were calculated.

Results. Compared with the direct mailing approach, uptake rates were significantly higher among GPs approached by telephone (30 versus 72%; P = 0.0001) and in the academic detailing approach (30 versus 67%; P = 0.0006). There was no significant difference between telephone contact and academic detailing (72 versus 67%; P = 0.75). There was a higher utilization rate in the academic detailing approach than in telephone contact (61 versus 31%; P = 0.023). There was no significant difference between direct mail and telephone contact (57 versus 31%; P = 0.16) or between direct mail and academic detailing (57 versus 61%; P = 0.95). The respective costs of the telephone and academic detailing approaches were 10 and 16 times that of the direct mailing approach.

Conclusion. Telephone contact and academic detailing are more effective than direct mail in encouraging GPs to request an SBI package, but GPs who were approached by academic detailing were more likely to have utilized the package than GPs who were approached by telephone. The relatively high uptake and utilization rates obtained in the academic detailing approach suggest that this approach is to be preferred in encouraging a rapid uptake of SBI among GPs. However, the high costs associated with this approach need to be taken into consideration.

Keywords. Alcohol drinking, family practice, marketing of health services, preventive medicine, randomized controlled trials..


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
A. Clifford, L. Jackson Pulver, R. Richmond, A. Shakeshaft, and R. Ivers
Disseminating best-evidence health-care to Indigenous health-care settings and programs in Australia: identifying the gaps
Health Promot. Int., December 1, 2009; 24(4): 404 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Alcohol AlcoholHome page
A. Beich, D. Gannik, H. Saelan, and T. Thorsen
Screening and brief intervention targeting risky drinkers in danish general practice A pragmatic controlled trial
Alcohol Alcohol., November 1, 2007; 42(6): 593 - 603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Alcohol AlcoholHome page
R. AGABIO, M. NIOI, C. SERRA, P. VALLE, and G. L. GESSA
ALCOHOL USE DISORDERS IN PRIMARY CARE PATIENTS IN CAGLIARI, ITALY
Alcohol Alcohol., May 1, 2006; 41(3): 341 - 344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
A. Beich, T. Thorsen, and S. Rollnick
Screening in brief intervention trials targeting excessive drinkers in general practice: systematic review and meta-analysis
BMJ, September 6, 2003; 327(7414): 536 - 542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
A. Beich, D. Gannik, and K. Malterud
Screening and brief intervention for excessive alcohol use: qualitative interview study of the experiences of general practitioners
BMJ, October 19, 2002; 325(7369): 870 - 870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.