Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richards, H.
Right arrow Articles by Emslie, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Richards, H.
Right arrow Articles by Emslie, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 17, No. 1, 71-75
© Oxford University Press 2000


Methodologies

The ‘doctor’ or the ‘girl from the University’? Considering the influence of professional roles on qualitative interviewing

Helen Richards and Carol Emslie

Department of General Practice, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Helen Richards, Department of General Practice, University of Glasgow, 4 Lancaster Crescent, Glasgow G12 0RR, UK.

Abstract

Background. Qualitative research methods are now recognized as valuable tools for primary care. With the increasing emphasis on evidence-based medicine and critical appraisal of published work, it is important that qualitative researchers are transparent about their methods and discuss the impact of the research process on their data.

Objectives. To consider the impact of the professional background of researchers on in-depth interviewing in primary care.

Methods. We compare interactions between the interviewer and respondents in two qualitative interview studies of heart disease. Both samples consisted of 60 middle-aged men and women from a range of social backgrounds living in the West of Scotland. One study was conducted by a GP and the other by a sociologist.

Results. Some interview interactions were common to both researchers; for example, interviews were often regarded by respondents as therapeutic. However, some interactions seemed to be related to the researcher's professional background. The GP's perceived higher status led to obscuring of her personal characteristics. The sociologist was often perceived as a ‘young woman’ rather than defined by her professional role. Thus respondents' perceptions of the interviewer influenced the interview interactions.

Conclusions. Appraising qualitative research depends on the transparency with which the research process is described. Awareness of professional background is particularly important for university departments of primary care (which often include doctors, nurses and social scientists) and should be considered carefully in designing, carrying out and disseminating the results of qualitative studies.

Keywords. Heart disease, methodology, qualitative research, reflexivity..


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
C. Emslie, F. Whyte, A. Campbell, N. Mutrie, L. Lee, D. Ritchie, and N. Kearney
'I wouldn't have been interested in just sitting round a table talking about cancer'; exploring the experiences of women with breast cancer in a group exercise trial
Health Educ. Res., December 1, 2007; 22(6): 827 - 838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
J. Hewitt
Ethical Components of Researcher Researched Relationships in Qualitative Interviewing
Qual Health Res, October 1, 2007; 17(8): 1149 - 1159.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
E. Peel, O. Parry, M. Douglas, and J. Lawton
"It's No Skin off My Nose": Why People Take Part in Qualitative Research
Qual Health Res, December 1, 2006; 16(10): 1335 - 1349.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
S Reventlow and C Tulinius
The doctor as focus group moderator--shifting roles and negotiating positions in health research
Fam. Pract., June 1, 2005; 22(3): 335 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
T. Lipman, M. J Murtagh, and R. Thomson
How research-conscious GPs make decisions about anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation: a qualitative study
Fam. Pract., June 1, 2004; 21(3): 290 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
K.-D. B. Nielsen, L. Dyhr, T. Lauritzen, and K. Malterud
"You can't prevent everything anyway": A qualitative study of beliefs and attitudes about refusing health screening in general practice
Fam. Pract., February 1, 2004; 21(1): 28 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
H. Richards, M. Reid, and G. Watt
Victim-blaming revisited: a qualitative study of beliefs about illness causation, and responses to chest pain
Fam. Pract., December 1, 2003; 20(6): 711 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
M. Aira, J. Kauhanen, P. Larivaara, and P. Rautio
Factors influencing inquiry about patients' alcohol consumption by primary health care physicians: qualitative semi-structured interview study
Fam. Pract., June 1, 2003; 20(3): 270 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
C. Emslie, K. Hunt, and G. Watt
A chip off the old block? Lay understandings of inheritance among men and women in mid-life
Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2003; 12(1): 47 - 65.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
H. M. Richards, M. E. Reid, and G. C. M. Watt
Socioeconomic variations in responses to chest pain: qualitative study
BMJ, June 1, 2002; 324(7349): 1308 - 1308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
C. A Chew-Graham, C. R May, and M. S Perry
Qualitative research and the problem of judgement: lessons from interviewing fellow professionals
Fam. Pract., June 1, 2002; 19(3): 285 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
H. M. Richards and L. J. Schwartz
Ethics of qualitative research: are there special issues for health services research?
Fam. Pract., April 1, 2002; 19(2): 135 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
K. Steven, J. Morrison, and N. Drummond
Lay versus professional motivation for asthma treatment: a cross-sectional, qualitative study in a single Glasgow general practice
Fam. Pract., April 1, 2002; 19(2): 172 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.