Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kamps, G.
Right arrow Articles by Jong, B M.-d.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kamps, G.
Right arrow Articles by Jong, B M.-d.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 17, No. 3, 254-260
© Oxford University Press 2000

Adherence to the guidelines of a regional formulary

GB Kamps, RE Stewart, GTh van der Werf, J Schuling and B Meyboom-de Jong

Department of General Practice of Groningen University, Ant. Deusinglaan 4, 9713 AW Groningen, The Netherlands.

Background. Pharmacotherapeutical guidelines, called formularies, have been developed to facilitate effective, efficient and cost-conscious prescribing. Monitoring adherence to such guidelines may be a reasonable way of assessing prescribing practices.

Objective. The aim of this study was to assess how strictly the GPs participating in our department's registration network adhere to the guidelines of the regional formulary, and which indications and drugs the GPs used.

Methods. This is a descriptive study, concerning 1000 consecutive prescriptions from each of the 17 participating GPs. The third edition of the Groningen formulary (GFIII), published in 1995, was used. If the drug prescribed was advised in the formulary, we considered it to be global adherence. If the indication was mentioned in the formulary, and the drug prescribed was advised for that indication in the formulary, it was considered to be specific adherence. Both the medications prescribed and the health problems registered by the GPs, but not mentioned in the GFIII, were analysed.

Results. The 17 000 prescriptions chosen for analysis formed ~25% of all prescriptions written by the GPs in 1 year. The indications for only 24 prescriptions (0.14%) were missing. Among the 17 GPs, the number of different drugs prescribed varied between 167 and 219 per 1000 prescriptions. The global adherence varied from 76 to 89% among the GPs, and the specific adherence varied from 55 to 71%. Of the 17 000 prescriptions, 11 457 (67%) concerned indications mentioned in the GFIII. Prescriptions for indications not mentioned in the GFIII contained 4353 (78.5%) drugs advised in the formulary. Of the 251 medications mentioned in the GFIII, only 15 (6%) were not prescribed.

Discussion. The GPs in our study were neither representative, nor were they chosen at random. Their patient population was comparable in age, sex and insurance status. These findings are an example of what level of adherence is obtainable. The formulary covered approximately two-thirds of the indications registered by GPs, and did not contain many unnecessary medications (6%).

Keywords. Family physicians, formularies, guidelines adherence, practice guidelines.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Fam PractHome page
A H.-V. de Wal, R. Smith, G. van der Werf, and B Meyboom-De Jong
Towards improvement of the accuracy and completeness of medication registration with the use of an electronic medical record (EMR)
Fam. Pract., June 1, 2001; 18(3): 288 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.