Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by den Otter, J. J
Right arrow Articles by van Weel, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by den Otter, J. J
Right arrow Articles by van Weel, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 17, No. 4, 314-316
© Oxford University Press 2000

Lung function measurement in general practice. General practice measurements compared with laboratory measurements during the DIMCA trial

Joost J den Otter, Marian A de Bruyn-Schmidt, Marie Jose Wolters, Constant P van Schayck, Hans TM Folgeringa, Henk JM van den Hoogen and Chris van Weel

Department of General Practice and Social Medicine and
a Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Nijmegen (M229), PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Background. Lung function measurement in the general practice setting (GPS) is of growing importance.

Objective.The aim of this study was to compare results from a lung function laboratory (LFL) with those in a GPS.

Methods.Comparisons were made for decline calculated from GPS and LFL measurements and intra-individual paired measurements. Test characteristics of the spirometer used in the GPS were also assessed.

Results. The mean decline in lung function was: –0.037 l/year [95% confidence interval (CI) –0.202 to 0.129] from LFL data and –0.027 l/year (95% CI –0.242 to 0.188) from GPS data. The mean intra-individual difference was –0.0025 l (95% CI –0.493 to 0.488 l). The test characteristics of the spirometer used in GPS did not meet all of the American Thoracic Society guidelines; in particular, the random error was too large. The difference in assessments between measurement in LFL and GPS were such that misclassification might occur if slopes were calculated.

Conclusions.Repeated measurement in this study showed that GPS measurements are not interchangeable with LFL measurements. Therefore, one has to be cautious when interchanging lung function data from an LFL and a GPS.

Keywords. Decline, general practice, lung function measurement.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ThoraxHome page
P. Enright
Provide GPs with spirometry, not spirometers
Thorax, May 1, 2008; 63(5): 387 - 388.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
B. P. Yawn, P. L. Enright, R. F. Lemanske Jr, E. Israel, W. Pace, P. Wollan, and H. Boushey
Spirometry Can Be Done in Family Physicians' Offices and Alters Clinical Decisions in Management of Asthma and COPD
Chest, October 1, 2007; 132(4): 1162 - 1168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
S.A. Kharitonov, F. Gonio, C. Kelly, S. Meah, and P.J. Barnes
Reproducibility of exhaled nitric oxide measurements in healthy and asthmatic adults and children
Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2003; 21(3): 433 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.