Family Practice Vol. 17, No. 5, 372-379
© Oxford University Press 2000
The General Practice Assessment Survey (GPAS): tests of data quality and measurement properties
Department of General Practice and Primary Care, GKT School of Medicine, Kings College, London SE11 6SP,
a London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT and
b National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 6PL, UK.
John L. Campbell, Department of General Practice and Primary Care, GKT School of Medicine, Kings College, London SE11 6SP, UK.
Objectives. The aim of this study was to describe the psychometric properties of the General Practice Assessment Survey (GPAS) and its acceptability to patients in the UK. GPAS comprises seven multiple item scales and two single item scales addressing nine key areas of primary care activity (access, technical care, communication, inter-personal care, trust, knowledge of patient, nursing care, receptionists and continuity of care). A further four single items relate to patients' perceptions of the GP's role in referral and co-ordination of care, their willingness to recommend their GP and their overall satisfaction with care received.
Methods. Two hundred consecutive patients attending routine consulting sessions at 55 inner London practices were invited to complete the GPAS questionnaire. The acceptability, reliability and validity of GPAS was assessed using standard psychometric techniques.
Results. Out of 11 000 patients, 7247 (66%) completed a questionnaire in a GP surgery. Fifty-five out of a separate sample of 77 patients attending one practice completed a second questionnaire mailed to them 1 week following their attendance. GPAS was acceptable to patients as evidenced by low proportions of missing data for all items, and a full range of possible scores for all but one of the nine scales. Reliability of the instrument was good. Multiple item scales had excellent internal consistency, high item–total correlations, and test–retest reliability. Scaling assumptions were confirmed, with six of the seven scales achieving 100% scaling success (convergent and discriminant validity). Construct validity was evident, although this requires further evaluation against external measures.
Conclusions. GPAS is a useful instrument for assessing several important dimensions of primary care. It is acceptable, reliable and valid, and has the potential for versatility in mode of administration. It will be a useful instrument for practices, primary care groups and primary care researchers evaluating key areas of primary care activity. Further work is required to evaluate its performance in non-inner-city settings and to evaluate further its validity against external criteria.
Keywords. General Practice Assessment Survey (GPAS), GPs, inner-city, quality questionnaire.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. S C Fung, A. Hua, L. Tam, and S. W Mercer Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the CARE Measure in a primary care setting in Hong Kong Fam. Pract., October 1, 2009; 26(5): 398 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Howard, G. Agarwal, and L. Hilts Patient satisfaction with access in two interprofessional academic family medicine clinics Fam. Pract., October 1, 2009; 26(5): 407 - 412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. M. Campbell, D. Reeves, E. Kontopantelis, B. Sibbald, and M. Roland Effects of Pay for Performance on the Quality of Primary Care in England N. Engl. J. Med., July 23, 2009; 361(4): 368 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Pantoja, M. Beltran, and G. Moreno Patients' perspective in Chilean primary care: a questionnaire validation study Int. J. Qual. Health Care, February 1, 2009; 21(1): 51 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Gucciardi, S. C.-T. Wang, M. DeMelo, L. Amaral, and D. E. Stewart Characteristics of men and women with diabetes: Observations during patients' initial visit to a diabetes education centre Can Fam Physician, February 1, 2008; 54(2): 219 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J L Campbell, A Dickens, S H Richards, P Pound, M Greco, and P Bower Capturing users' experience of UK out-of-hours primary medical care: piloting and psychometric properties of the Out-of-hours Patient Questionnaire Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2007; 16(6): 462 - 468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Howard, J. Goertzen, B. Hutchison, J. Kaczorowski, and K. Morris Patient Satisfaction With Care for Urgent Health Problems: A Survey of Family Practice Patients Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2007; 5(5): 419 - 424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Hann, P. Bower, S. Campbell, M. Marshall, and D. Reeves The association between culture, climate and quality of care in primary health care teams Fam. Pract., August 1, 2007; 24(4): 323 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. G Evans, A. Edwards, S. Evans, B. Elwyn, and G. Elwyn Assessing the practising physician using patient surveys: a systematic review of instruments and feedback methods Fam. Pract., April 1, 2007; 24(2): 117 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. H Alazri, P. Heywood, R. D Neal, and B. Leese UK GPs' and practice nurses' views of continuity of care for patients with type 2 diabetes Fam. Pract., April 1, 2007; 24(2): 128 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Fairhurst and C. May What General Practitioners Find Satisfying in Their Work: Implications for Health Care System Reform Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2006; 4(6): 500 - 505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Downs, S. M.B. Ariss, E. Grant, J. Keady, S. Turner, M. Bryans, J. Wilcock, E. Levin, R. O'carroll, and S. Iliffe Family carers' accounts of general practice contacts for their relatives with early signs of dementia Dementia, August 1, 2006; 5(3): 353 - 373. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Coulter Can patients assess the quality of health care? BMJ, July 1, 2006; 333(7557): 1 - 2. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Rao, A. Clarke, C. Sanderson, and R. Hammersley Patients' own assessments of quality of primary care compared with objective records based measures of technical quality of care: cross sectional study BMJ, July 1, 2006; 333(7557): 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C Salisbury, A Burgess, V Lattimer, D Heaney, J Walker, J Turnbull, and H Smith Developing a standard short questionnaire for the assessment of patient satisfaction with out-of-hours primary care Fam. Pract., October 1, 2005; 22(5): 560 - 569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Howie, D Heaney, and M Maxwell Quality, core values and the general practice consultation: issues of definition, measurement and delivery Fam. Pract., August 1, 2004; 21(4): 458 - 468. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P Bower, S Campbell, C Bojke, and B Sibbald Team structure, team climate and the quality of care in primary care: an observational study Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2003; 12(4): 273 - 279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Bower, M. Roland, J. Campbell, and N. Mead Setting standards based on patients' views on access and continuity: secondary analysis of data from the general practice assessment survey BMJ, February 1, 2003; 326(7383): 258 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Bower, N. Mead, and M. Roland What dimensions underlie patient responses to the General Practice Assessment Survey? A factor analytic study Fam. Pract., October 1, 2002; 19(5): 489 - 495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. C. Stange The paradox of the parts and the whole in understanding and improving general practice Int. J. Qual. Health Care, August 1, 2002; 14(4): 267 - 268. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S M Campbell, J Braspenning, A Hutchinson, and M Marshall Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care Qual. Saf. Health Care, January 12, 2002; 11(4): 358 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S M Campbell, M Hann, J Hacker, C Burns, D Oliver, A Thapar, N Mead, D G. Safran, and M O Roland Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study BMJ, October 6, 2001; 323(7316): 784 - 784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J L Campbell, J Ramsay, and J Green Age, gender, socioeconomic, and ethnic differences in patients' assessments of primary health care Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2001; 10(2): 90 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|