Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meal, A. G
Right arrow Articles by Hammersley, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meal, A. G
Right arrow Articles by Hammersley, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 17, No. 5, 394-400
© Oxford University Press 2000

Time changes in new cases of ischaemic heart disease in general practice

Andrew G Meal, Mike Pringlea and Victoria Hammersleya

School of Nursing (Postgraduate Division), Medical School and
a Division of General Practice, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.

Background. There are no recent studies of the presentation of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) in general practice. What information exists is derived from the secondary care setting, where seasonal and daily variation has been reported in admissions for IHD. There are epidemiological studies that show a falling incidence and mortality for IHD. It is not clear, however, if this is also the case in clinical general practice.

Objectives. The aims of the present study were to (i) estimate the number of cases of IHD in general practice populations; (ii) determine the recorded diagnosis and time of first presentation of IHD during a 5 year period; and (iii) perform time series analysis on the above data.

Methods. The design of the study was a retrospective survey, using MIQUEST software, of computer databases in five general practices with a combined population of nearly 40 000 patients. The five practices were selected randomly from volunteering practices in the Trent Focus Collaborative Research Network. All patients with a new diagnosis of IHD recorded between January 1993 and December 1997 inclusive were included in the study. The number of new cases of IHD, the recorded diagnosis and time of first presentation of IHD were the main outcome measures.

Results. A total of 644 new cases of IHD were identified during the study period: 54.0% ‘angina pectoris’, 26.9% ‘acute myocardial infarction’, 18.8% ‘ischaemic heart disease’, 0.3% ‘coronary atherosclerosis’. Time series analysis reveals a seasonal and weekly pattern to new cases of IHD, with peak cases occurring in January and on Mondays/Fridays. A downward trend was detected for new cases of IHD (all diagnoses) over the 5 year period, and for new cases of IHD (excluding acute myocardial infarction). An upward trend was observed for new cases of acute myocardial infarction.

Conclusion. Presentation of IHD in general practice varies according to season and day of the week. The proportion of new cases recorded as ‘angina pectoris’ or ‘ischaemic heart disease’ is falling, and this decline masks a rise in the incidence recordings of ‘acute myocardial infarction’.

Keywords. Ischaemic heart disease, MIQUEST, seasonal, time series analysis, trend.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
W. D. Pace, L. M. Dickinson, and E. W. Staton
Seasonal Variation in Diagnoses and Visits to Family Physicians
Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2004; 2(5): 411 - 417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
K. Thiru, A. Hassey, and F. Sullivan
Systematic review of scope and quality of electronic patient record data in primary care
BMJ, May 15, 2003; 326(7398): 1070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.