Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donker, G. A
Right arrow Articles by Foets, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Donker, G. A
Right arrow Articles by Foets, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 17, No. 6, 508-513
© Oxford University Press 2000

Hormone replacement therapy: changes in frequency and type of prescription by Dutch GPs during the last decade of the millennium

Gé A Donker, Peter Spreeuwenberg, Aad IM Bartelds, Koos van der Velden and Marleen Foets

NIVEL: The Dutch Sentinel Practice Network, The Netherlands.

Correspondence to GA Donker, NIVEL, Postbus 1568, 3500 BN-Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Objective. The present study was conducted in order to determine the change of frequency and type of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) regimen newly prescribed by Dutch GPs.

Methods. A comparison was made of two data sets (multi-stage random samples) collected in 1987/88 and from 1995 to 1998 concerning women 40 years and older who were newly prescribed HRT.

Results. Compared with 1987/88, 50% more patients were newly prescribed HRT in 1998 (2.0 in 1987/88 and 3.0 in 1998 per 1000 registered women, P < 0.01). The age distribution remained about the same, with a peak between 50 and 54 years in each year of registration. Unopposed oestrogens (including plasters) were prescribed less frequently (1.3{per thousand} in 1987/88 versus 0.7{per thousand} in 1998, P < 0.001), and combinations of oestrogen and progestogen more frequently in 1998 (0.2{per thousand} in 1987/88 versus 1.8{per thousand} in 1998, P < 0.01). Sequential therapy was prescribed slightly more frequently than continuous therapy (65% sequential therapy in 1995; 55% in 1998). The most frequent reason for starting HRT in 1995–1998 was climacteric symptoms (89–98%), followed by osteoporosis prevention (16–28%) and early menopause (13–25%). Rarely were preventive goals the only reason (6%) for prescribing HRT.

Conclusions. The number of HRT prescriptions increased by 50% over the last decade of the millennium. The age distribution remained the same. There was a tendency to shift from prescribing unopposed oestrogens to combinations of oestrogens and progestogens. Alleviation of climacteric symptoms was the main reason for prescribing HRT throughout the registration period. Prescription of HRT for prevention of osteoporosis and/or cardiovascular disease has so far not been adopted on a large scale by Dutch GPs.

Keywords. General practice, hormone replacement therapy, menopause, osteoporosis, prevention..


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.