Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jewell, D.
Right arrow Articles by Donovan, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jewell, D.
Right arrow Articles by Donovan, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 17, No. 6, 522-528
© Oxford University Press 2000

Beliefs and Behaviour

Teenage pregnancy: whose problem is it?

David Jewella, Jo Tacchib and Jenny Donovanb

a Division of Primary Health Care and
b Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Correspondence to D Jewell, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 2PR, UK.

Background. The UK has the highest rates of teenage conception in Europe. Teenage conception has been identified in medical literature as a problem for society and teenagers. However, little attempt has been made to see it from the perspective of the teenagers themselves.

Objective. To explore teenage women's attitudes to sexual health, contraception and pregnancy.

Methods. Ethnographic qualitative study based on in-depth interviews and participant observation. The study took place in young mothers' groups, young persons' clinics and general practices in Bristol. Subjects were 34 young women between the ages of 16 and 20, sampled purposefully in two groups to include young mothers and never-pregnant young women from advantaged and disadvantaged socioeconomic backgrounds.

Results. The two groups did not differ in their use of contraception at first intercourse. Young women from more socioeconomically advantaged backgrounds felt that motherhood would not be acceptable to them, but were more tolerant to others who became young mothers. The pregnant/ young mothers revealed more difficulties getting access to reliable contraceptive services, and dissatisfaction with sex education in schools. The pregnant/young mothers found abortion to be less acceptable than the more socially advantaged group. Both groups reported sexual behaviour that involved risks of becoming pregnant, but the more socially advantaged group were more likely to use emergency contraception.

Conclusions. The study demonstrates the importance of taking the views of young people into account when planning both sex education and the provision of contraceptive services.

Keywords. Adolescence, contraception, pregnancy, socioeconomic factors.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Health Education JournalHome page
C Reeves, R Whitaker, R K Parsonage, C A Robinson, K Swale, and L Bayley
Sexual health services and education: Young people's experiences and preferences
Health Education Journal, December 1, 2006; 65(4): 368 - 379.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Fam PractHome page
M. Zarzeczna-Baran and B. Balkowska
Teenage pregnancy: whose problem is it?
Fam. Pract., April 1, 2002; 19(2): 211 - 211.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
H. Schreiber
Adolescents from different socioeconomic backgrounds had different attitudes about teen pregnancy
Evid. Based Nurs., October 1, 2001; 4(4): 125 - 125.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.