Family Practice Vol. 18, No. 1, 21-26
© Oxford University Press 2001
Research in Practice |
Features of primary health care teams associated with successful quality improvement of diabetes care: a qualitative study
Clinical Governance Research and Development Unit, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Leicester and
a Leicestershire Primary Care Audit Group, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Correspondence to Keith Stevenson, Clinical Governance Research and Development Unit, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Leicester, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK.
Background. In quality improvement activities such as audit, some general practices succeed in improving care and some do not. With audit of care likely to be one of the major tools in clinical governance, it would be helpful to establish what features of primary health care teams are associated with successful audit in general practice.
Objective. The aim of the present study was to identify those features of primary health care teams that were associated with successful quality improvement during systematic audit of diabetes care.
Method. Semi-structured tape-recorded interviews were carried out with lead GPs and practice nurses in 18 general practices in Leicestershire that had the opportunity to improve their care and had completed two data collections in a multipractice audit of diabetes care. The interviewees were asked to describe their practice's approach to audit and the transcripts were coded for common features and judged for strength of feeling by blinded independent raters. Features common to practices that had, and those that had not, managed to improve diabetes care were identified.
Results. Six features were identified reliably in the transcripts by blinded independent raters. Four were significantly associated with the successful improvement of care. Success was more likely in teams in which: the GP or nurse felt personally involved in the audit; they perceived their teamwork as good; they had recognized the need for systematic plans to address obstacles to quality improvement; and their teams had a positive attitude to continued monitoring of care. A positive attitude to audit and a personal interest in the disease were not associated with improvement in care.
Conclusions. Success in improving diabetes care is associated with certain organizational features of primary health care teams. Experimental studies are required to determine whether the development of teamwork enables practice teams to identify and overcome systematically the obstacles to improved quality of patient care that face them.
Keywords. Audit, clinical governance, diabetes care, quality improvement, teams.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G. M. Russell, S. Dahrouge, W. Hogg, R. Geneau, L. Muldoon, and M. Tuna Managing Chronic Disease in Ontario Primary Care: The Impact of Organizational Factors Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2009; 7(4): 309 - 318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Spurling and P. Mansfield General practitioners and pharmaceutical sales representatives: quality improvement research Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2007; 16(4): 266 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Feifer, L. Nemeth, P. J. Nietert, A. M. Wessell, R. G. Jenkins, L. Roylance, and S. M. Ornstein Different Paths to High-Quality Care: Three Archetypes of Top-Performing Practice Sites Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2007; 5(3): 233 - 241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. H Alazri, P. Heywood, R. D Neal, and B. Leese UK GPs' and practice nurses' views of continuity of care for patients with type 2 diabetes Fam. Pract., April 1, 2007; 24(2): 128 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Feifer, S. M. Ornstein, R. G. Jenkins, A. Wessell, S. T. Corley, L. S. Nemeth, L. Roylance, P. J. Nietert, and H. Liszka The Logic Behind a Multimethod Intervention to Improve Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines in a Nationwide Network of Primary Care Practices Eval Health Prof, March 1, 2006; 29(1): 65 - 88. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. M Campbell, M. O Roland, E. Middleton, and D. Reeves Improvements in quality of clinical care in English general practice 1998-2003: longitudinal observational study BMJ, November 12, 2005; 331(7525): 1121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. A Donker, D. M Fleming, F. G Schellevis, and P. Spreeuwenberg Differences in treatment regimes, consultation frequency and referral patterns of diabetes mellitus in general practice in five European countries Fam. Pract., August 1, 2004; 21(4): 364 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Grumbach and T. Bodenheimer Can Health Care Teams Improve Primary Care Practice? JAMA, March 10, 2004; 291(10): 1246 - 1251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.-M. Feron, F. Cerexhe, D. Pestiaux, M. Roland, D. Giet, C. Montrieux, and D. Paulus GPs working in solo practice: obstacles and motivations for working in a group? A qualitative study Fam. Pract., April 1, 2003; 20(2): 167 - 172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Burch, W. Rhine, R. Baker, F. Litman, J. W. Kaempf, E. Schwarz, S. Sun, N. R. Payne, and P. J. Sharek Implementing Potentially Better Practices to Reduce Lung Injury in Neonates Pediatrics, April 1, 2003; 111(4): e432 - 436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Other Articles Noted Evid. Based Nurs., October 1, 2001; 4(4): E1 - 11. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|