Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (55)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, C
Right arrow Articles by Allan, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, C
Right arrow Articles by Allan, R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 18, No. 1, 48-52
© Oxford University Press 2001


Doctor-patient relationships

Barriers to help seeking in people with urinary symptoms

C Shaw, R Tansey, C Jackson, C Hyde and R Allan

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Leicester, 22–28 Princess Road West, Leicester 1LE 6TP, UK.

Background. Urinary incontinence is a common problem but, for those experiencing significant clinical symptoms, help seeking has been reported to be as low as 20%. As many of these people could be helped by simple interventions, there is a clear need to identify barriers to help seeking and develop interventions to overcome these barriers.

Objectives. This study explores help-seeking behaviour in people with urinary symptoms such as leakage, frequency, nocturia and urgency in order to identify barriers to service use.

Method. Thirty-one people who either had agreed to treatment as part of an intervention study or who were receiving treatment at a hospital out-patient clinic for their urinary problems took part in unstructured, taped interviews. Respondents were questioned about their views on help seeking for urinary problems and their personal experiences of consultations. The data were transcribed, coded and thematic analysis carried out.

Results. The most common theme to emerge was a lack of knowledge of the condition and of available treatments. Urinary symptoms frequently were considered a normal part of ageing or childbirth, or it was felt that these types of symptoms were inappropriate for medical intervention. Older people were not only more likely to accept symptoms but were also less likely to want to bother their GP. Patients did not always communicate their concerns about urinary symptoms to their GP, through either embarrassment or misconceptions of what is a ‘medical problem’.

Conclusions. There is a clear need for health education and health promotion in this area. Future work should explore professionals' knowledge and views of these types of conditions with the aim of providing guidelines for management in primary care.

Keywords. Family practice, health behaviour, health services accessibility, urinary incontinence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health ManagementHome page
P. Krishnatray, S. S. Bisht, K. Guha, and S. Pinto
Development of a Scale to Determine Barriers to Paediatric Eye Care
Journal of Health Management, December 1, 2008; 10(3): 293 - 309.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
A. Doshani, E. Pitchforth, C. J Mayne, and D. G Tincello
Culturally sensitive continence care: a qualitative study among South Asian Indian women in Leicester
Fam. Pract., December 1, 2007; 24(6): 585 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
Z. Jumadilova, S. Varadharajan, P. Girase, and D. A. Ollendorf
Retrospective evaluation of outcomes in patients with overactive bladder receiving tolterodine versus oxybutynin
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., December 1, 2006; 63(23): 2357 - 2364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
A. J. Huang, J. S. Brown, A. M. Kanaya, J. M. Creasman, A. I. Ragins, S. K. Van Den Eeden, and D. H. Thom
Quality-of-Life Impact and Treatment of Urinary Incontinence in Ethnically Diverse Older Women.
Arch Intern Med, October 9, 2006; 166(18): 2000 - 2006.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
C. Shaw, R. D. Gupta, D. M Bushnell, R P. Assassa, P. Abrams, A. Wagg, C. Mayne, C. Hardwick, and M. Martin
The extent and severity of urinary incontinence amongst women in UK GP waiting rooms
Fam. Pract., October 1, 2006; 23(5): 497 - 506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. S. Brown, C. S. Bradley, L. L. Subak, H. E. Richter, S. R. Kraus, L. Brubaker, F. Lin, E. Vittinghoff, D. Grady, and for the Diagnostic Aspects of Incontinence Study (
The Sensitivity and Specificity of a Simple Test To Distinguish between Urge and Stress Urinary Incontinence
Ann Intern Med, May 16, 2006; 144(10): 715 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
S. Horrocks, M. Somerset, H. Stoddart, and T. J. Peters
What prevents older people from seeking treatment for urinary incontinence? A qualitative exploration of barriers to the use of community continence services
Fam. Pract., December 1, 2004; 21(6): 689 - 696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
S. Hinchliff and M. Gott
Perceptions of Well-Being in Sexual Ill Health: What Role does Age Play?
J Health Psychol, September 1, 2004; 9(5): 649 - 660.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. M. Holroyd-Leduc and S. E. Straus
Management of Urinary Incontinence in Women: Clinical Applications
JAMA, February 25, 2004; 291(8): 996 - 999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
Other Articles Noted
Evid. Based Nurs., October 1, 2001; 4(4): E1 - 11.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.