Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sarkadi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenqvist, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sarkadi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenqvist, U.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 18, No. 2, 161-166
© Oxford University Press 2001

Decision-making in the consultation

Contradictions in the medical encounter: female sexual dysfunction in primary care contacts

Anna Sarkadi and Urban Rosenqvist

Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala Science Park, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.

Background. Over the past two decades, primary care physicians have been encouraged to participate in the management of sexual disturbances. Women with type 2 diabetes, often treated by GPs, are at high risk of experiencing sexual dysfunction.

Objective. Very few qualitative studies have described the impact of sexual dysfunction on the diabetic women experiencing it. Our aim was, therefore, to explore the effects, if any, of type 2 diabetes on ‘womanhood and intimacy’ and investigate whether women wish to receive medical attention for their sexual disturbances.

Methods. We used a purposeful sample of middle-aged and older women (44–80 years) diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (n = 33). Methods triangulation was employed: focus group interviews were combined with observer data and a structured, anonymous questionnaire. We performed content analysis, with co-researcher control for systematic bias during the coding process.

Results. Personal characteristics, such as age, sex, experience and attitude of the doctor, the speciality considered to be appropriate (GP versus gynaecologist) and circumstances (time and privacy) in the primary care setting appeared to significantly influence women's willingness to discuss—if at all—sexual matters with physicians.

Conclusion. GPs should aim to create an open atmosphere to encourage discussion of female sexual dysfunction in the consultation room. However, women with sexual problems might benefit more from peer help through patient or women's organizations. The role of GPs might therefore consist of supporting these services and identifying female sexual dysfunction in type 2 diabetes, a problem that middle-aged and older women have difficulty communicating.

Keywords. GP, middle age, sexual dysfuction, type 2 diabetes, women.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Fam PractHome page
M. Gott, E. Galena, S. Hinchliff, and H. Elford
"Opening a can of worms": GP and practice nurse barriers to talking about sexual health in primary care
Fam. Pract., October 1, 2004; 21(5): 528 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Fam PractHome page
M. Gott and S. Hinchliff
Barriers to seeking treatment for sexual problems in primary care: a qualitative study with older people
Fam. Pract., December 1, 2003; 20(6): 690 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 The Diabetes EducatorHome page
A. Sarkadi and U. Rosenqvist
Intimacy and Women With Type 2 Diabetes: An Exploratory Study Using Focus Group Interviews
The Diabetes Educator, July 1, 2003; 29(4): 641 - 652.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.