Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muir, E. H
Right arrow Articles by Ogden, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Muir, E. H
Right arrow Articles by Ogden, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 18, No. 4, 419-424
© Oxford University Press 2001

Consultations involving people with congenital disabilities: factors that help or hinder giving care

Elizabeth H Muir and Jane Ogden

Department of General Practice, UMDS, UK.

Dr EH Muir, Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, Imperial College School of Medicine at the Charing Cross Campus, Reynold's Building, London W6 8RF, UK.

Background. Previous studies have suggested that the attitudes of health professionals towards people with disability may be as negative as those of society. Further, even positive attitudes may not always be reflected in the health professional's behaviour.

Objective. The aim of this study was to examine GPs' (registrars and trainers) consultations with people who have congenital disabilities and to explore incidents when their attitudes were either matched or not matched with their behaviour.

Methods. A purposeful sample of 19 registrars and trainers participated in a semi-structured interview using the critical incident technique. Subjects were asked to describe encounters from their professional life with a person with a congenital disability, when they either had or had not been able to behave as they wished.

Results. The results indicated that matching or non-matching between attitudes and behaviour was related to three main themes: aspects of the patient such as their appearance, ease of communication and autonomy; aspects of the GP including their management of personal, expert and professional boundaries and the historical context of the consultation including the GP's personal and professional experience, the familiarity between the GP and the patient and the patient's previous experiences of care.

Conclusion. The critical incident technique was found to be a useful tool to gain access into this complex and problematic area and the results raise many issues pertinent to the planning of learning opportunities for both undergraduates and postgraduates.

Keywords. Congenital disability/developmental disability, critical incident technique, general practice/family practice, medical education..


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.