Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fairhurst, K.
Right arrow Articles by May, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fairhurst, K.
Right arrow Articles by May, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 18, No. 5, 501-505
© Oxford University Press 2001


The consultation

Knowing patients and knowledge about patients: evidence of modes of reasoning in the consultation?

Karen Fairhurst and Carl Maya

Department of Community Health Sciences (General Practice), University of Edinburgh and
a School of Primary Care, University of Manchester; present address: Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Background. The idea that the patient is in some way known to the doctor is an important one in general practice. The thrust towards patient-centred medicine, the promotion of open and negotiative consultation skills and the development of a biopsychosocial model of primary care medicine all rely on the patient providing a history composed of more than a list of facts.

Objective. Our aim was to explore the nature and importance of doctors' knowledge about patients.

Methods. Fifteen GPs audio-recorded 25–30 consultations with consecutive consenting patients. They scored each consultation according to how satisfying they found it. Semi-structured interviews based on a selection of consultations were conducted to draw out the doctor's views on the factors that were important to their satisfaction. The interviews were transcribed verbatim. Qualitative analysis was inductive and iterative.

Results. Within doctors' narratives, we found accounts of two ways of ‘knowing' the patient. The first was a deductive mode of reasoning derived from facts about the patient. The facts that were known were specific to the context of the general practice consultation and led to biomedical and biographical knowledge. The second was an inductive mode of reasoning derived from a contextual interpretation of the facts about the patient which resulted in knowledge of their behaviour and cognitions. Both modes of reasoning gave the doctor knowledge of the patient and permitted action by the doctor in the consultation but led to different interpretations of the patient and different experiences of the consultation.

Conclusion. ‘Knowing the patient' is important to the way GPs attribute meaning to their work. Doctors were more likely to identify as ‘known' those patients with whom they adopted an inductive mode of reasoning. In addition, their experience of the consultation was more likely to be positive.

Keywords. Consultation, GPs, ‘knowing', knowledge.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
K. Fairhurst and C. May
What General Practitioners Find Satisfying in Their Work: Implications for Health Care System Reform
Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2006; 4(6): 500 - 505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chronic IllnessHome page
C. May
Chronic illness and intractability: professional--patient interactions in primary care
Chronic Illness, March 1, 2005; 1(1): 15 - 20.
[PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.