Family Practice Vol. 19, No. 1, 105-111
© Oxford University Press 2002
Research Issues |
Not another questionnaire! Maximizing the response rate, predicting non-response and assessing non-response bias in postal questionnaire studies of GPs
Health Services Research Group, General Practice and Primary Care Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 2SR,
a School of Nursing, Coupland 3, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL,
b Holme Tower Marie Curie Centre, Bridgeman Road, Penarth CF64 3YR and
c Velindre Hospital, Cardiff CF4 7XL, UK.
Background. Non-response is an important potential source of bias in survey research. With evidence of falling response rates from GPs, it is of increasing importance when undertaking postal questionnaire surveys of GPs to seek to maximize response rates and evaluate the potential for non-response bias.
Objectives. Our aim was to investigate the effectiveness of follow-up procedures when undertaking a postal questionnaire study of GPs, the use of publicly available data in assessing non-response bias and the development of regression models predicting responder behaviour.
Method. A postal questionnaire study was carried out of a random sample of 600 GPs in Wales concerning their training and knowledge in palliative care.
Results. A cumulative response rate graph permitted optimal timing of follow-up mailings: a final response rate of 67.6% was achieved. Differences were found between responders and non-responders on several parameters and between sample and population on some parameters: some of these may bias the sample data. Logistic regression analysis indicated medical school of qualification and current membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners to be the only significant predictors of responders. Late responders were significantly more likely to have been qualified for longer.
Conclusions. This study has several implications for future postal questionnaire studies of GPs. The optimal timing of reminders may be judged from plotting the cumulative response rate: it is worth sending at least three reminders. There are few parameters that significantly predict GPs who are unlikely to respond; more of these may be included in the sample, or they may be targeted for special attention. Publicly available data may be used readily in the analysis of non-response bias and generalizability.
Keywords. General practice, non-response, postal questionnaire, response rate.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Geirsson, G. Hensing, and F. Spak Does Gender Matter? A Vignette Study of General Practitioners' Management Skills in Handling Patients with Alcohol-Related Problems Alcohol Alcohol., November 1, 2009; 44(6): 620 - 625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Grava-Gubins and S. Scott Effects of various methodologic strategies: Survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training Can Fam Physician, October 1, 2008; 54(10): 1424 - 1430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Hummers-Pradier, C. Scheidt-Nave, H. Martin, S. Heinemann, M. M Kochen, and W. Himmel Simply no time? Barriers to GPs' participation in primary health care research Fam. Pract., April 15, 2008; (2008) cmn015v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 O. A. Bjertnaes, A. Garratt, and G. Botten Nonresponse Bias and Cost-Effectiveness in a Norwegian Survey of Family Physicians Eval Health Prof, March 1, 2008; 31(1): 65 - 80. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. S. Metkus The Declining Number and Variety of Procedures Done by General Internists Ann Intern Med, December 4, 2007; 147(11): 815 - 815. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Popay, U. Kowarzik, S. Mallinson, S. Mackian, and J. Barker Social problems, primary care and pathways to help and support: addressing health inequalities at the individual level. Part I: the GP perspective J Epidemiol Community Health, November 1, 2007; 61(11): 966 - 971. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Wetzel, W. Himmel, R. Heidenreich, E. Hummers-Pradier, M. M Kochen, A. Rogausch, J. Sigle, H. Boeckmann, S. Kuehnel, W. Niebling, et al. Participation in a quality of care study and consequences for generalizability of general practice research Fam. Pract., August 1, 2005; 22(4): 458 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Stokes, C. Tarrant, A. G. Mainous III, H. Schers, G. Freeman, and R. Baker Continuity of Care: Is the Personal Doctor Still Important? A Survey of General Practitioners and Family Physicians in England and Wales, the United States, and the Netherlands Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2005; 3(4): 353 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. W. RABORN, K. S. CHAN, and M. GRACE Treatment modalities and medication recommended by health care professionals for treating recurrent herpes labialis J Am Dent Assoc, January 1, 2004; 135(1): 48 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Barclay, P. Wyatt, S. Shore, I. Finlay, G. Grande, and C. Todd Caring for the dying: how well prepared are general practitioners? A questionnaire study in Wales Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2003; 17(1): 27 - 39. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Stocks and D. Gunnell A chain is as strong as its weakest link but that link could be the subject matter of the questionnaire! Fam. Pract., December 1, 2002; 19(6): 704 - 704. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|