Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sandvik, H.
Right arrow Articles by Cho, H.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sandvik, H.
Right arrow Articles by Cho, H.-J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 19, No. 1, 72-76
© Oxford University Press 2002


Original Paper

Attitudes to family practice registration programmes. Survey of Korean and Norwegian family doctors

Hogne Sandvik and Hong-Jun Choa

Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Ulriksdal 8c, N-5009 Bergen, Norway and
a Department of Family Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Korea.

Background. In order to save money and improve continuity, many countries plan to introduce registration programmes and capitation.

Objective. The aim of this study was to explore family doctors' attitudes towards such programmes.

Methods. Random samples of board-certified Korean family doctors (n = 205) and Norwegian general practice specialists (n = 257) were included in a postal survey using a structured questionnaire with visual analogue scales. Main outcome measures were demographic characteristics, practice types, workload, level of agreement with 10 statements and explanatory variables for the principal attitude towards a registration programme (regression analyses).

Results. Overall response rate was 79%. Nineteen per cent [95% confidence interval (CI) 14–23%] of Norwegian and 96% (95% CI 93–99%) of Korean doctors were solo practitioners. Korean doctors reported 388 (95% CI 359–418) consultations per week and Norwegian doctors 83 (95% CI 80–87). Satisfaction with their present organization was lower in Korea (50%, 95% CI 46–53%) than in Norway (71%, 95% CI 68–74%). Korean doctors were more in favour of a registration programme (70%, 95% CI 66–73%) than Norwegian doctors (57%, 95% CI 53–61%). Main explanatory variables for being in favour of a registration programme were increased continuity (ß 0.495, P < 0.001) and dissatisfaction with the present system (ß –0.212, P < 0.001). In Korea, the prospect of more comprehensive care (ß 0.440, P < 0.001) and a positive attitude towards gatekeeping (ß 0.193, P < 0.001) were strong predictors, while Norwegian doctors favour a registration programme if it will not increase their workload (ß –0.166, P < 0.01).

Conclusion. Regardless of nationality, most family doctors favour a registration programme.

Keywords. Attitude of health personnel, continuity of patient care, family practice, gatekeeping, health services administration.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Fam PractHome page
P Magin, J Adams, M Ireland, E Joy, S Heaney, and S Darab
The response of general practitioners to the threat of violence in their practices: results from a qualitative study
Fam. Pract., June 1, 2006; 23(3): 273 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.