Family Practice Vol. 19, No. 1, 99-104
© Oxford University Press 2002
Research Issues |
Recruiting family physicians and patients for a clinical trial: lessons learned
a Department of Family Medicine and
b Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University and the
c Health Services Delivery Research Unit, Father Sean O'ullivan Research Centre, St. Joseph’ Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Michelle Howard, 105 Main Street East Level P1, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 1G6.
Background. The randomized controlled trial (RCT) is the most definitive tool for evaluating an intervention. However, methodological deficiencies may limit the internal or external validity of the RCT.
Objective. Our aim was to describe the tactics used and the resources required randomly to select and recruit family physicians (FPs) and their patients aged 65 and older (seniors) for a community-based cluster RCT in primary care.
Methods. We randomly selected 48 FPs in 24 urban and rural sites in Southern Ontario, and 889 of their community-dwelling seniors (
20 per FP) taking five or more medications daily. To accomplish this, the principal investigator (an FP) contacted the eligible FPs. The participating FPs’ office staff then generated and contacted the roster of eligible seniors, with support provided by the research staff.
Results. Of the 163 randomly selected FPs telephoned, 94 were ineligible and 48 (69.6%) of the remaining 69 participated. The rosters were generated with the assistance of the research staff (taking 1.5–8.0 hours) in each of the 48 practices, using electronic appointment records (n = 26), electronic billing records (n = 17), electronic medical records (n = 2) or written charts or file cards (n = 3). Of the 2078 seniors approached, 799 were ineligible and 889 (69.5%) of the remaining 1279 participated. Seniors' refusal rates among practices ranged from 4.8 to 62.3%.
Conclusions. Recruitment of a representative sample and generalizability of results are possible in RCTs in primary care. Involvement of an FP in physician recruitment and clinical research nurses who provided assistance to office staff were keys to success.
Keywords. Generalizability, primary care research, RCT.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Ivaz, S. Brennan, S. Dean, S. Hay, P. Hay, S. Kerry, and P. Oakeshott Lessons learned from recruiting young female students to a randomised controlled trial of chlamydia screening Fam. Pract., April 1, 2006; 23(2): 188 - 191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Ewing, M. Rogers, S. Barclay, J. McCabe, A. Martin, and C. Todd Recruiting patients into a primary care based study of palliative care: why is it so difficult? Palliative Medicine, July 1, 2004; 18(5): 452 - 459. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Howard, L. Dolovich, J. Kaczorowski, C. Sellors, and J. Sellors Prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications to elderly people Fam. Pract., June 1, 2004; 21(3): 244 - 247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Sellors, J. Kaczorowski, C. Sellors, L. Dolovich, C. Woodward, A. Willan, R. Goeree, R. Cosby, K. Trim, R. Sebaldt, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a pharmacist consultation program for family physicians and their elderly patients Can. Med. Assoc. J., July 8, 2003; 169(1): 17 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. H Cosby, M. Howard, J. Kaczorowski, A. R Willan, and J. W Sellors Randomizing patients by family practice: sample size estimation, intracluster correlation and data analysis Fam. Pract., February 1, 2003; 20(1): 77 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|