Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shickle, D.
Right arrow Articles by Qureshi, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shickle, D.
Right arrow Articles by Qureshi, N.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 19, No. 2, 193-196
© Oxford University Press 2002

Original Paper

The genetics liaison nurse role as a means of educating and supporting primary care professionals

Darren Shickle, Rhydian Hapgood and Nadeem Qureshia

School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA and
a Division of General Practice, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.

Background. Previous research with primary health care professionals has demonstrated consistently that education, training and support are necessary before there should be any expansion in primary care genetics. The genetic liaison nurse role has been suggested as one means of providing this education and support.

Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate GP responses to the genetics liaison nurse role as a means of supporting community-based genetics services.

Methods. A self-completion postal questionnaire in primary care was sent to GPs working in Nottingham. Main outcome measures were assessment of potential usage of a genetic outreach professional in terms of time, roles and support for a pilot scheme

Results. A total of 182 (55.0%) of 331 GPs working in Nottingham returned a questionnaire. Although 54% did not believe that the genetics liaison nurse role would be useful in the present, most believed that such a role would definitely or probably (64%) be useful in the future. The most valued contribution was as a source of advice when genetics problems arise in a consultation. Providing education on specific genetic disorders and on clinical skills relevant to genetics were also seen as important. Many GPs would also use a liaison nurse to see patients prior to their attending an out-patient clinic with a clinical geneticist. Respondents suggested that each nurse should spend ~3 hours a month in each practice and be attached to between 10 and 20 practices.

Conclusions. GPs appreciate that there may be limited genetics services provided in primary care at present, but this is likely to change in the near future. The genetics liaison nurse role should be evaluated as a means of providing genetics specialist outreach support for service delivery and to facilitate education.

Keywords. Genetics, liaison nurse, primary care.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Fam PractHome page
B. J Wilson, N. Torrance, J. Mollison, M S. Watson, A. Douglas, Z. Miedzybrodzka, R. Gordon, S. Wordsworth, M. Campbell, N. Haites, et al.
Cluster randomized trial of a multifaceted primary care decision-support intervention for inherited breast cancer risk
Fam. Pract., October 1, 2006; 23(5): 537 - 544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Med. Genet.Home page
N Qureshi, R Hapgood, and S Armstrong
Continuous medical education approaches for clinical genetics: a postal survey of general practitioners
J. Med. Genet., November 1, 2002; 39(11): e69 - 69.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.