Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kitai, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lustman, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kitai, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lustman, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 19, No. 3, 247-250
© Oxford University Press 2002

Erectile dysfunction—the effect of sending a questionnaire to patients on consultations with their family doctor

Eliezer Kitai, Shlomo Vinker, Felix Kijner and Alex Lustman

Department of Family Medicine University of Tel Aviv, Israel.

S Vinker, MD, PO Box 14238, Ashdod 77042, Israel.

Background. Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common problem among male adults that generally has been ignored by family practitioners.

Objective. Our aim was to assess the effect of a mailed questionnaire about ED on the readiness of patients to raise the subject with their family doctor.

Methods. The study population included all men aged 40 years and over on the patient list of a family practitioner. A control group made up of males of similar ages was chosen in another family practice. The patient files were reviewed for ED. Anonymous questionnaires including questions about sexual dysfunction and satisfaction with sex life, as well as demographic and medical details, were sent to the study population. Patients who suffered from ED were invited to visit their family doctor. In the following 2 months, the study and control group populations' visits to the family practitioner were monitored for complaints of sexual dysfunction.

Results. In the 2 years prior to the study, 14/205 (6.8%) of the study population had complained to their family practitioner of ED in comparison with 6/205 (2.9%) in the control group (P = NS). In the 2 months following the sending of the questionnaire, 23 patients consulted their family practitioner with ED, 19 of whom had not discussed their problem with the family practitioner previously; only a further two patients went to discuss ED in the same period in the control group (P < 0.001). A total of 85/205 (41.5%) patients returned the questionnaire and 35/85 (42.5%) said they suffered from ED. Of 35 patients who reported ED, 15 had been for a consultation; only six of them consulted their family doctor.

Conclusion. ED is reported infrequently to family doctors. Sending an anonymous questionnaire on the subject increases awareness of the problem and in turn increases the number of cases that can be treated.

Keywords. Erectile dysfunction, family practitioner, questionnaire.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.