Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wu, T.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, T. H.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wu, T.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, T. H.-H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 19, No. 3, 272-277
© Oxford University Press 2002

Long-term mortality assessment using biological measures among elderly people. Ten-year follow-up of 597 healthy elderly subjects in Taiwan

Tzy-Haw Wu, Ti-Kai Lee, Ming-Fang Yena, Tao-Hsin Tungb and Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chena

Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine,
a Institute of Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei and
b Community Medicine Research Center and Institute of Public Health, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Dr Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen, Institute of Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Background. Identifying biological measures that are predictive of mortality for elderly people aged over 65 years has not been fully elucidated in oriental studies.

Objective. The associations between these biological measures and long-term mortality were therefore investigated, and classifications for risk of death were developed among Taiwanese elderly people

Methods. Data used in this study were derived from a total of 597 apparently healthy subjects aged over 65 years identified from a nationwide survey that was conducted between 1989 and 1991 in Taiwan. Each participant received a physical examination and a wide range of biological measures. These 597 apparently healthy subjects were followed to 31 December 1999 to determine the cause of death. The grouping technique using factor analysis was first used to aggregate similar characteristics of biological measures into reduced components. Risk of death for each subject was classified into four groups: good (A), fair (B), modest (C) and poor (D). Hazard ratios for groups B, C, D against A were calculated.

Results. The overall 10-year survival rate was 72% [95% confidence interval (CI) 68–76%]. The adjusted hazard ratios for all-cause death in high and mid-level categories of haematological components versus the lowest group were 0.51 (95% CI 0.33–0.80) and 0.56 (95% CI 0.37–0.85), respectively. Group D had a 6-fold risk of death as compared with group A (relative risk = 6.34, 95% CI 3.85–10.52). The corresponding figures were 2.48 (95% CI 1.43–4.29) and 1.60 (95% CI 2.88–6.89) for groups B and C, respectively.

Conclusions. The relationships of biological measures to long-term mortality were elucidated. Information on classification for risk of death may be helpful for elderly people to pay attention to their health status after receiving a health check-up.

Keywords. Biological measures, elderly people, long-term mortality.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
H.-K. Chen, C.-D. Tseng, S.-C. Wu, T.-K. Lee, and T. H.-H. Chen
A prospective cohort study on the effect of sexual activity, libido and widowhood on mortality among the elderly people: 14-year follow-up of 2453 elderly Taiwanese
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2007; 36(5): 1136 - 1142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.