Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bekkelund, S. I.
Right arrow Articles by Albretsen, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bekkelund, S. I.
Right arrow Articles by Albretsen, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 19, No. 3, 297-299
© Oxford University Press 2002

Evaluation of referrals from general practice to a neurological department

Svein Ivar Bekkelund and Claus Albretsen

Department of Neurology, Tromsø University Hospital, N-9038 Tromsø, Norway.

Background. The presence of neurological deficits as obtained from clinical examination increases the likelihood of detecting serious underlying brain disorders.

Objectives. In this study, we assessed the frequency of reported clinical neurological examination in patients referred to neurology.

Methods. We consecutively evaluated referrals to a neurological centre during a 6-month period.

Results. From a total of 716 patients, 377 (51%) had an examination reported in the referral letter. Clinical examinations were reported more often in patients with musculo-skeletal disorders compared with others, P = 0.0001. Examination was less likely to be reported in those with a history of disturbed consciousness.

Conclusion. By showing that only about half of the patients had an examination reported, the study demonstrates that the process of selecting those with a high priority for a secondary neurological service can be improved.

Keywords. General practice, neurological diagnoses, neurological examination, referral, secondary care.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 NeurologyHome page
R.B. Lipton, D. Dodick, R. Sadovsky, K. Kolodner, J. Endicott, J. Hettiarachchi, and W. Harrison
A self-administered screener for migraine in primary care: The ID MigraineTM validation study
Neurology, August 12, 2003; 61(3): 375 - 382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.