Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Sá, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Catry, M. d. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Sá, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Catry, M. d. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 19, No. 4, 362-364
© Oxford University Press 2002

Genital infection by Chlamydia trachomatis in Lisbon: prevalence and risk markers

Armando Brito de Sá, João Paulo Gomesa, Sílvia Viegasa, Maria Arminda Ferreiraa, Albertina Paulinoa and Maria dos Anjos Catrya

Instituto de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa and
a Unidade de Clamídia, Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Av. Padre Cruz, 1649-016 Lisboa, Portugal.

Armando Brito de Sá; E-mail: abritosa{at}sapo.pt

Background. There is little information about the prevalence and risk markers for Chlamydia trachomatis infections in Portugal.

Objectives. Our aim was to assess the prevalence of C. trachomatis genital infection and to study variables associated with this infection in a group of sexually active women aged <=30 years living in the Lisbon area and to estimate the prevalence of C. trachomatis infection among partners of infected patients.

Methods. A systematic sample of women observed in general practice family planning and teenager clinics was collected. A questionnaire was administered, followed by a pelvic examination. A first-catch urine sample was taken for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) Amplicor assay. When a sample tested positive, the woman was invited to obtain a urine sample from her partner. Socio-demograhic, behavioural and clinical variables were studied and their association with the PCR Amplicor result was assessed.

Results. A total of 1108 women, aged between 14 and 30 years, were studied. Fifty-one women (4.6% of total sample) tested positive for C. trachomatis. The prevalence of infection was slightly higher in patients aged <=19 years (5.3%) than in age groups 20–25 (4.8%) and 26–30 years (3.9%). African ethnicity was related to a higher percentage of infection than European ethnicity: 9.8% versus 3.8%, P= 0.0067. Use of condoms ‘sometimes/never’ was associated with a higher prevalence of infection: 5.2% versus 2.3% in those responding ‘always/almost always’ (P= 0.0447). An altered cervix was associated with a higher prevalence of infection: 7.3% versus 3.7% with a normal cervix (P= 0.0106). Urine samples were obtained from 16 partners of infected patients. Six partners (37.5%) tested positive for C. trachomatis.

Conclusions. A 4.6% prevalence of C. trachomatis genital infection was found. African ethnicity, using condoms ‘sometimes/never’ and an altered cervix were associated with C. trachomatis infection, but showed low positive predictive value for C. trachomatis infection. Younger age may be associated with a slight increase in risk. Contact tracing for diagnosis and treatment remains a difficult issue to approach effectively.

Keywords. Chlamydia trachomatis, contact tracing, epidemiology, polymerase chain reaction, sexual behaviour.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
V Verhoeven, D Avonts, A Meheus, H Goossens, M Ieven, S Chapelle, C Lammens, and P Van Royen
Chlamydial infection: an accurate model for opportunistic screening in general practice
Sex Transm Inf, August 1, 2003; 79(4): 313 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.