Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stocks, N.
Right arrow Articles by Fahey, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stocks, N.
Right arrow Articles by Fahey, T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 19, No. 4, 375-377
© Oxford University Press 2002

Labelling of acute respiratory illness: evidence of between-practitioner variation in the UK

Nigel Stocks and Tom Faheya

Department of General Practice, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia and
a Division of Primary Health Care, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 2PR, UK.

Dr Stocks; E-mail: nigel. stocks{at}adelaide.edu.au

Background. It is unclear which symptoms and signs GPs use when attributing diagnostic labels to patients with acute respiratory illness (ARI).

Objective. We sought to ascertain GPs' self-reported definitions of ARI.

Methods. A postal questionnaire concerned with the diagnosis of ARI was sent to all registered GPs in Avon Health Authority. GPs were asked to choose a clinical term that would describe the clinical presentation in four hypothetical patients, and the next three questions asked them to define acute bronchitis, upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) and any other term they used for ARI (excluding pneumonia). We measured proportions and compared responses across the three diagnostic categories.

Results. The majority (88%) of GPs agreed that cough associated with fever should be labelled as a URTI. When sputum and chest signs were also present, opinion was more divided, with 62% diagnosing acute bronchitis in young patients and 72% lower respiratory tract infection in old patients.

Conclusions. This study demonstrates that there is more consistent use of diagnostic labels for URTI than for acute bronchitis or other terms used to label ARI. In the future, researchers should quantify the prognostic significance of symptoms and signs in ARI and provide GPs with a more rational approach to the diagnosis and management of ARI.

Keywords. Acute respiratory illness, GPs, labelling, variation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Fam PractHome page
A. D Hay, J. Heron, A. Ness, and the ALSPAC study team
The prevalence of symptoms and consultations in pre-school children in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC): a prospective cohort study
Fam. Pract., August 1, 2005; 22(4): 367 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Fam PractHome page
A. D Hay, A. Wilson, T. Fahey, and T. J Peters
The duration of acute cough in pre-school children presenting to primary care: a prospective cohort study
Fam. Pract., December 1, 2003; 20(6): 696 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.