Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Humair, J.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Stalder, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Humair, J.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Stalder, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 19, No. 4, 383-389
© Oxford University Press 2002

Promoting influenza vaccination of elderly patients in primary care

Jean-Paul Humair, Cristina Rizzi Buchs and Hans Stalder

Department of Community Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, 24 Rue Micheli-du-Crest, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland.

Jean-Paul Humair; E-mail: Jean-Paul.Humair{at}hcuge.ch

Background. Though influenza is a serious health problem for elderly people, their influenza vaccination rate remains low in Switzerland.

Objective. Our aim was to assess the impact of an intervention combining multiple strategies to promote influenza vaccination of elderly patients in primary care.

Methods. We conducted a pre-/post-intervention study in a university-based primary care clinic in Geneva, Switzerland, where an annual community-wide campaign promotes influenza vaccination of people at high risk. We included 318 and 346 patients aged over 64 years attending the clinic during the last trimesters of 1995 and 1996, respectively. The intervention included: patient information by leaflets and posters, a walk-in vaccination clinic, a training workshop for physicians, record reminders and peer comparison feedback on vaccination performance. Using the computerized database, medical records and the vaccination register, we measured influenza immunization rates and relative benefits (RBs) of the intervention.

Results. Influenza vaccine uptake globally increased from 21.7% before the intervention to 51.7% thereafter. Among 144 patients attending in both phases, the immunization rate rose from 29.2 to 69.4% [matched RB estimate (<RB>) = 2.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9–3.0]; vaccine uptake increased particularly among all chronic patients (<RB> = 3.2; 95% CI 2.2–4.6), cardiac patients (<RB> = 3.4; 95% CI 2.1–5.4) and diabetics (<RB> = 3.3; 95% CI 1.9–5.9). For 376 patients attending in a single phase, the vaccination rate rose from 15.5 to 39.1% (adjusted RB = 2.8; 95% CI 1.8–4.4), particularly among the elderly aged 65–75 years (adjusted RB = 5.7; 95% CI 2.7–12.4).

Conclusion. An intervention combining strategies targeting patients, physicians and care delivery significantly increased influenza vaccine uptake of elderly patients in primary care, particularly those at high risk.

Keywords. Aged, ambulatory care, influenza vaccine, quality of health care.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
M. H. Coady, S. Galea, S. Blaney, D. C. Ompad, S. Sisco, D. Vlahov, and for the Project Viva Intervention Working Group
Project VIVA: A Multilevel Community-Based Intervention to Increase Influenza Vaccination Rates Among Hard-to-Reach Populations in New York City
Am J Public Health, July 1, 2008; 98(7): 1314 - 1321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Epidemiol RevHome page
D. C. Ompad, S. Galea, and D. Vlahov
Distribution of Influenza Vaccine to High-Risk Groups
Epidemiol. Rev., August 1, 2006; 28(1): 54 - 70.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.