Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuilboer, M. M
Right arrow Articles by van der Lei, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuilboer, M. M
Right arrow Articles by van der Lei, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 19, No. 5, 442-447
© Oxford University Press 2002

Feasibility of AsthmaCritic, a decision-support system for asthma and COPD which generates patient-specific feedback on routinely recorded data in general practice

Manon M Kuilboera, Marc AM van Wijka, Mees Mossevelda, Emiel van der Doesb, Ben P Ponsioenb, Johan C de Jongstec, Shelley E Overbeekd and Johan van der Leia

a Department of Medical Informatics,
b Family Practice,
c Pediatrics and
d Pulmonology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

MM Kuilboer, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Ee2100, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands; E-mail: kuilboer{at}mi.fgg.eur.nl

Background. Introducing decision-support systems as a tool to stimulate the dissemination of clinical guidelines in daily practice has been disappointing. Researchers have argued that integration of such systems with clinical practice is a prerequisite for acceptance. The big question concerns the feasibility of a true integration—if only routinely recorded data are used for such a system, can patient-specific feedback be produced?

Objective. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of generating patient-specific feedback based on routinely recorded data in general practice by AsthmaCritic, a decision-support system for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Methods. We built the decision-support system AsthmaCritic and assessed its ability to detect asthma and COPD patient records and generate patient-specific feedback by retrospective analysis of routinely recorded data in 103 713 electronic patient records from primary care practices. We grouped feedback into categories of comments by age group (<12 years and >=12 years). The main outcome measures were the number and percentage of ‘triggered’ (selected) asthma and COPD patient records, and the number and percentage of records on which AsthmaCritic produced at least one feedback comment during the 1-year study period, by category of comments.

Results. AsthmaCritic detected 8784 (8.5%) asthma and COPD patient records. During the study period, AsthmaCritic generated 255 664 feedback comments (mean 3.4 per patient visit). The most frequently generated category of comments in the case of patients aged >=12 years was ‘non-compliant prescription’ (23.7%), whereas the most frequent category in the case of patients <12 years was ‘non-compliant route’ (31.1%).

Conclusions. This study shows that, using routinely recorded data only, AsthmaCritic is able to detect asthma and COPD patient records for further analysis and to produce patient-specific feedback.

Keywords. Asthma, COPD, decision-support systems, family practice, guideline adherence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
D. L. Sanders and D. Aronsky
Biomedical Informatics Applications for Asthma Care: A Systematic Review
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2006; 13(4): 418 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.