Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Groot, R. A
Right arrow Articles by Meyboom-de Jong, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Groot, R. A
Right arrow Articles by Meyboom-de Jong, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 19, No. 5, 516-519
© Oxford University Press 2002


Health Services Research

The implementation of a call-back system reduces the doctor’s workload, and improves accessibility by telephone in general practice

Reinier A de Groot, Jan de Haan, Henk EP Bosveld, Albert Nijland and Betty Meyboom-de Jong

Department of Family Practice, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 4, 9713 AW Groningen, The Netherlands.

Mr RA de Groot, De Klokkemaat 2, 8375 HC Oldemarkt, The Netherlands; E-mail: hapo{at}radegroot.demon.nl

Background. In a general practice in The Netherlands, the demand for direct telephone consultation with the doctor became extreme, which resulted in poorly managed consultations, and poor telephone access due to busy lines. A call-back telephone appointment system was therefore introduced: all calls are answered and, when possible, managed by the practice assistant. If the assistant feels incapable, or if the patient prefers to speak to the doctor, a telephone appointment is scheduled, at which time the doctor returns the patient’s call.

Objective. Our aim was to evaluate the effects of a call-back telephone appointment system on doctors’ workload and patients’ telephone access to doctors.

Methods. Telephone consultation data over 10 weeks were selected before and after the introduction of the call-back telephone appointment system. The outcomes measured were: number and duration of telephone calls to doctors, the reason for each call and how often telephone lines were engaged during the specified telephone hour.

Results. The number of calls requiring the doctor’s attention was reduced by 59% and total time spent on the telephone by the GPs was reduced by 39%. This reduction is explained by a change in the reasons for calling. Telephone accessibility improved, as busy telephone lines were no longer an issue.

Conclusion. The call-back telephone appointment system is superior to the previously used open access telephone hour.

Keywords. Telephone consultation, telephone management, workload.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.