Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walter, F. M
Right arrow Articles by Britten, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walter, F. M
Right arrow Articles by Britten, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 19, No. 6, 579-586
© Oxford University Press 2002

Patients’ understanding of risk: a qualitative study of decision-making about the menopause and hormone replacement therapy in general practice

Fiona M Waltera and Nicky Brittenb

a General Practice & Primary Care Research Unit, Institute of Public Health & Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 2SR and
b Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Guy’s, King’s and St Thomas’ School of Medicine, King’s College, London, UK.

Correspondence to FM Walter; E-mail: fmw22{at}medschl.cam.ac.uk

Objective. To explore women’s understanding of the risks associated with the menopause and hormone replacement therapy (HRT).

Methods. Two general practices in Cambridge participated in this qualitative study using focus groups and semi-structured interviews. Forty women aged between 50 and 55 years, known to be current users, ex-users, or never-users of HRT were included in the study.

Results. Participants viewed risk as a danger: coping with risk required an assessment to facilitate an informed decision. To understand risk and make a personal interpretation, patients used their own knowledge, the presentation and context of that risk, together with their individual belief system particularly relating to representations of womanhood, lay beliefs and fatalism, control and choice. Experience, age and emotions often modified the salience of risk, and participants then used this meaning to weigh up the risks and benefits of a particular threat.

Conclusion. Participants gained understanding of risk by an active risk assessment process involving individual and complex interplay between knowledge and core beliefs, allowing the assessment of risks and benefits to facilitate an informed decision about the menopause and HRT.

Keywords. Decision-making, general practice, HRT, menopause, risk.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
P. A. Newman, D. S. Seiden, K. J. Roberts, L. Kakinami, and Naihua Duan
A Small Dose of HIV? HIV Vaccine Mental Models and Risk Communication
Health Educ Behav, April 1, 2009; 36(2): 321 - 333.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Obstetrician and GynaecologistHome page
J. Drife
Putting risk into context
Obstet Gynaecol (Lond), January 1, 2007; 9(1): 42 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
S. Reventlow and H. Bang
Brittle bones: Ageing or threat of disease Exploring women's cultural models of osteoporosis
Scand J Public Health, May 1, 2006; 34(3): 320 - 326.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
S. Thorne, T. G. Hislop, M. Kuo, and E.-A. Armstrong
Hope and Probability: Patient Perspectives of the Meaning of Numerical Information in Cancer Communication
Qual Health Res, March 1, 2006; 16(3): 318 - 336.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
E. Sellon and P. Oakeshott
Patient's understanding of risk
Fam. Pract., August 1, 2003; 20(4): 494 - 494.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.