Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Braithwaite, D.
Right arrow Articles by Emery, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Braithwaite, D.
Right arrow Articles by Emery, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 19, No. 6, 587-590
© Oxford University Press 2002

Internet-based risk assessment and decision support for the management of familial cancer in primary care: a survey of GPs’ attitudes and intentions

Dejana Braithwaitea, Stephen Suttona, W Henry Smithsonb and Jon Emerya

a General Practice and Primary Care Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge,
b The Surgery, Escrick, York, UK.

Dejana Braithwaite, General Practice and Primary Care Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 2SR, UK; E-mail: dkb22{at}medschl.cam.ac.uk

Background. Computer decision support systems have been proposed as a suitable method to enable primary care practitioners to manage familial cancer and advise about other developments in clinical genetics.

Objective. To investigate GPs’ preferences, attitudes and intentions regarding the use of Genetic Risk Assessment on the Internet and Decision Support (GRAIDS) in clinical practice.

Methods. GPs were recruited through a physician Internet portal for UK GPs (www.ukpractice.net). Electronic questionnaires assessed the respondents’ current practice regarding family history taking and risk assessment, preferences about particular attributes of GRAIDS, intentions to use GRAIDS for familial cancer management and factors associated with these intentions.

Results. Two hundred and sixty-eight GPs completed the electronic survey (adjusted response rate = 51.2%). Seventy-two GPs participated in a telephone survey of non-respondents (adjusted response rate = 63%). Ninety-two per cent of respondents in the electronic survey and 68% in the telephone survey stated that they would be either extremely or fairly likely to use GRAIDS. Intentions were associated with positive attitudes toward GRAIDS, beliefs that colleagues and patients would find the tool acceptable, perceived control and perceived confidence about conducting risk assessment and making appropriate decisions about patient management. Key attributes for the implementation of GRAIDS in practice were the authoritativeness of the guideline, easy user interface, the validity and reliability of risk estimation and specific advice about patient management.

Conclusion. GP users of the physician portal www.ukpractice.net value GRAIDS as an aid for the management of familial cancer in primary care. These Internet-literate GPs are likely to be early adopters of GRAIDS in clinical practice and could be important in promoting the use of such technology to support high quality advice about genetic issues in primary care.

Keywords. Cancer genetics, general practitioners, Internet, risk assessment and decision support.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LIFESTYLE MEDICINEHome page
R. E. Gramling and J. I. Vidrine
Risk Communication During Screening for Genomic Breast Cancer Susceptibility
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, January 1, 2007; 1(1): 54 - 58.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
A. Walker, M. Watson, J. Grimshaw, and C. Bond
Applying the theory of planned behaviour to pharmacists' beliefs and intentions about the treatment of vaginal candidiasis with non-prescription medicines
Fam. Pract., December 1, 2004; 21(6): 670 - 676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
D. Braithwaite, J. Emery, S. de Lusignan, and S. Sutton
Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative?
Fam. Pract., October 1, 2003; 20(5): 545 - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
J. Knottnerus
Community genetics and community medicine
Fam. Pract., October 1, 2003; 20(5): 601 - 606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.