Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chew-Graham, C. A
Right arrow Articles by Cole, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chew-Graham, C. A
Right arrow Articles by Cole, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 19, No. 6, 632-637
© Oxford University Press 2002

Managing depression in primary care: another example of the inverse care law?

Carolyn A Chew-Grahama, Sean Mullinb, Carl R Mayc, Scott Hedleyb and Hannah Coleb

a School of Primary Care, University of Manchester M14 5NP,
b Y4 student, University of Manchester,
c Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle,

Carolyn A Chew-Graham, School of Primary Care, Rusholme Health Centre, Walmer St, Manchester M14 5NP; E-mail: cchew{at}man.ac.uk

Background. Depression is a common problem, often being recurrent or becoming chronic. The National Service Framework for Mental Health (published by the Department of Health, 1999) states that people with depression should continue to be predominantly managed in primary care. There is much evidence that the detection and management of depression by GPs could be improved, but little work has focused on GPs’ views of their work with depressed patients.

Objectives. This was a qualitative study exploring GP attitudes to the management of patients with depression. Views of GPs in socio-economically deprived areas are compared with those serving more affluent populations.

Methods. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with two groups of GPs in north-west England. One group of GPs (22) were practising in inner-city areas, and a second group (13) in suburban and semi-rural practices. All were Principals in practices that participated in undergraduate teaching. The interviews were audio-taped and subsequently transcribed verbatim. Analysis was by constant comparison until category saturation of each theme was achieved.

Results. Subjects conceptualized depression as an everyday problem of practice, rather than as an objective diagnostic category. Thematic coding of their accounts suggests a tension between three kinds of views of depressed people: (i) That depression is a common and normal response to life events or change and that it reflects the medicalization of these conditions; (ii) That the label or diagnosis of depression offers a degree of secondary gain to both patients and doctors, particularly to those GPs practising in inner-city areas and (iii) That inner-city GPs experienced on-going management of depressed people as an interactional problem, in contrast to those GPs serving a less deprived population who saw depression as a treatable illness and as rewarding work for the GP.

Conclusion. Depression is commonly presented to GPs who feel that the diagnosis often involves the separation of a normal reaction to environment and true illness. For those patients living in socio-economically deprived environments, the problems, and therefore the depression, are seen to be insoluble. This has an important implication for the construction of educational interventions around improving the recognition and treatment of depression in primary care: some doctors may be reluctant to recognize and respond to such patients in depth because of the much wider structural and social factors that we have suggested in this paper. That it is the doctors working with deprived populations who express these views, means that the ‘Inverse care law’ [Tudor Hart J. The inverse care Law. Lancet 1971; 1(7696): 405–412] operates in the management of depression.

Keywords. Depression, inverse care law, primary care, sick role.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
S. WEICH, I. NAZARETH, L. MORGAN, and M. KING
Treatment of depression in primary care: Socio-economic status, clinical need and receipt of treatment
The British Journal of Psychiatry, August 1, 2007; 191(2): 164 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health (London)Home page
K. Pollock
Maintaining face in the presentation of depression: constraining the therapeutic potential of the consultation
Health (London) , April 1, 2007; 11(2): 163 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
T. Ostbye, D. H. Taylor Jr, W. S. Yancy Jr, and K. M. Krause
Associations Between Obesity and Receipt of Screening Mammography, Papanicolaou Tests, and Influenza Vaccination: Results from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and the Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD) Study
Am J Public Health, September 1, 2005; 95(9): 1623 - 1630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
C. Shiels, M. Gabbay, C. Dowrick, and C. Hulbert
Depression in men attending a rural general practice: factors associated with prevalence of depressive symptoms and diagnosis
The British Journal of Psychiatry, September 1, 2004; 185(3): 239 - 244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
C. Chew-Graham, R. Baldwin, and A. Burns
Treating depression in later life
BMJ, July 24, 2004; 329(7459): 181 - 182.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health (London)Home page
R. Thomas-MacLean and J. M. Stoppard
Physicians' Constructions of Depression: Inside/Outside the Boundaries of Medicalization
Health (London) , July 1, 2004; 8(3): 275 - 293.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
R. Moorhead
Hart of Glyncorrwg
J R Soc Med, March 1, 2004; 97(3): 132 - 136.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.