Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Family Practice
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bateman, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bateman, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Family Practice Vol. 19, No. 6, 691-697
© Oxford University Press 2002

A Research Information Sheet for Practices (RISP): a tool to facilitate research participation

Hilarie Bateman

General Practice & Primary Care Research, Institute of Public Health, University Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 2SR, UK; E-mail: HB208{at}medschl.cam.ac.uk

Background. Practice teams may receive many requests to become involved in research studies. The information they receive may not necessarily provide the information they need to make a quick and informed decision about participation. Facilitating good decisions about research involvement has potential value for researchers, practitioners and research/development managers.

Objective. To develop and pilot a template (RISP) for communicating information about research studies to practice teams.

Methods. A participatory approach was used to develop the template involving primary care practitioners, researchers and research/development managers. The process of developing and piloting the template was recorded using an action research approach. Data were derived from documentation about policy, notes from participant observation and evaluation questionnaires.

Results. The RISP template was used as a source of reference about practical implications of research and as a means to communicate information about research studies to practice teams. Practice respondents valued its use in enabling members of the practice team to quickly assimilate information about the proposed research study and in providing the basis for a well-informed decision about participation. Its value to record keeping (and to research governance) was anticipated at the planning stage but was not as yet strongly evident in responses from practice.

Conclusion. The RISP template has been designed to reflect the concerns of researchers, primary care practitioners and research/development managers. It can contribute to the documentation required in support of research governance.

Keywords. Clinical protocols, family practice, patient selection, research design, Research Information Sheet for Practices.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Family Practice:

Thinking about risk. Can doctors and patients talk the same language?
David Misselbrook and David Armstrong
Family Practice 2002 19: 1-2. [Extract] [FREE Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
S Murray, S Barclay, M. Bennett, M Kendall, Z Amir, and M Lloyd-Williams
Editorial: Palliative care research in the community: it is time to progress this emerging field
Palliative Medicine, July 1, 2008; 22(5): 609 - 611.
[PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
E. Hummers-Pradier, C. Scheidt-Nave, H. Martin, S. Heinemann, M. M Kochen, and W. Himmel
Simply no time? Barriers to GPs' participation in primary health care research
Fam. Pract., April 15, 2008; (2008) cmn015v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.